Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

Happy Waitangi Day

Yes, once again, it’s (Wai – Tang – Ee) Day in Aotearoa (New Zealand). For those who are unfamiliar, it’s kind of like New Zealand’s equivalent of Independence Day in the U.S, but not quite.  

Here are some shared commonalities: 1) It was about evading rule by tyranny 2) It was important to our ancestors to stand up for what was considered “right” or at least common decency 3) The memorialization of the day was too important for its celebration to be simply tacked on to the following Monday to create an extended holiday weekend for modern-day workers. Both national days are recognized on either 6th Feb or 4th July, regardless of the day of the week. 

Captain William Hobson, as Consul for Queen Victoria, negotiated a “peace agreement” with chiefs representing many iwi (tribes), effectively promising Māori protection from French ambitions, for in his plan, they would become equal partners and subjects of the British Crown. The intention was not for the indigenous Māori to lose their right to their land, but that the English would be given the sole right to purchase the land. Missionaries played a huge part in the proceedings. They had begun to convert the indigenous people and they reminded their converts that the Queen was not only the head of State, but head of the Church too. They relayed to the Māori that Queen Victoria sent these explorers as “an act of love” and that her desire was that the Māori retain their property, their rights, and their privileges. These appeals went a long way to cementing the initial trust of the local chiefs. It is assumed they viewed the benefits of British protection to outweigh their fears of what others might do to them otherwise. However, all the good intentions written, bilingually, into The Treaty, were not subsequently followed through. Māori, as recognized British subjects or not, lost the legal right of much of their land either via unfair deals with the settlers or outright confiscation. What transpired next was an uncommon sequel of events, whereby without a war or conflict, a “peace treaty” had been signed, which only then thereafter, resulted in a war. The New Zealand Wars took place between 1845-1872. 

I am blessed to have lived twenty-six years in New Zealand and have had a close association with the Bay of Islands, the home of the Waitangi Treaty Grounds, where the treaty was signed. I have so many great memories of this historic region of the country. It’s where I sat on the grass that surrounds the Paihia beachfront and opened my first newspaper-wrapped bundle of piping hot fish and chips. It's that same beach where I learned how there is no need for changing rooms when you already have an over-sized beach towel! It takes practice, but it is definitely possible to completely change out of your street clothes and into your togs, right there on the beach, just try not to drop your towel as you drop your drawers! 

Our wedding rehearsal dinner was superbly prepared and served at the Paihia beachfront La Scala restaurant. However, my father-in-law, in his capacity as the local milk vendor, made it a point of never dining at any of the eating establishments, for he visited their kitchens on a daily basis. And yet, there was something very special about the Waitangi Hotel. The Trust who owned the Waitangi restaurant and hotel during those years covering the 1980’s, made ones visit an unforgettable experience. First, there are the pristine grounds which overlook the majestic bay, the upmarket hotel and restaurant, and then the awe-inspiring marae, or meeting house, and the wakas (canoes) used by the local iwi. Even my initial crossing of the one-lane bridge, that one must use to get to the Waitangi grounds, was a memorable experience. What do I do, half way across this elongated, but narrow bridge when there is a car approaching me? “No problem”, my passenger assured me. “Just go toward the car coming at you and pull into the passing bay.” Ok ... and hope I get to the passing bay first? Thankfully, I was less nervous the more I used this unique bridge. 

Most of the times when crossing that bridge, I was the passenger; a passenger in my father-in-law's milk truck. A witty friend of mine from Ohio penned the situation up best, “Ole Beckley had many hopes and dreams; And he ended up in New Zealand delivering milk and cream.” Don’t get me wrong, I loved every minute working on that milk truck. We would stop at the residences along the way first. I would hop out and collect the empty bottles and milk tokens out of the letterbox whilst my “boss” would be rearranging the milk crates at the back of his unrefrigerated truck, before finding just the bottles intended for that stop, then hand them to me to replace the empty ones that I had just taken from the bottom of the letterbox. Our next stop would often be the dairy/convenience store located at the Opua Wharf, where the ferry carrying passengers back and forth all day, and from all over the bay, would dock temporarily. It was an unexpected pregnancy of this dairy’s owner, one in which also resulted in a red-headed child, that started up the fun-loving rumor that the child’s father was “the milkman” seeing how his wife had red hair. Our milk truck would then rumble along the shoreline before stopping to service all of the milk-carrying businesses in the center of a town called Pahia. After this stop, we would go to the summer campground supplying milk to all of the campers before ending our day/night at the Waitangi Hotel. 

I would be terribly remiss if I concluded my description of the Paihia/Bay of Islands milk run without mentioning how my father-in-law first met a young local lad, who oddly enough, the family came to deeply respect, and a person who so kindly befriended me, and this Ole Yank will forever be grateful for his friendship. The initial meeting of “Martin” and my father-in-law was a bit of an inauspicious start, though. What I have neglected to mention up to this point is that the road from Kawakawa (home town of my in-laws) to Paihia is hilly and winding and not without its own one-lane bridges to navigate. Loaded-down milk trucks struggle with speed on the flat let alone the hills and curves, and understandably this frustrates drivers. My father-in-law always pulled to the side of the road to allow the traffic to pass him, but gearing down his diesel-powered engine to get around the sharp bends and up and over the hills usually meant there was no choice but to gut it out. There was one afternoon when my friend “Martin” came flying around one of these bends in his car and in the opposite direction, but directly toward the milk truck. A spin out on his part, and my father-in-law nearly placing his truck’s left wheels over the cliff, is the only thing that avoided what would’ve been an ugly collision. My father-in-law saw his life pass before him, but not before getting a good look of who the errant driver was. Being the close-knit community it was then, and is now, I need not mention any more of the aftermath of this meeting of the pair that day, other than to say that it has become a note of legend throughout the community. 

My father-in-law really despised visiting Paihia unless it was on business. And yet, his wide-eyed American son-in-law who only saw sun and surf along the touristy Paihia beach, was always pestering him to take the family for a swim. I got my wish, kind of. We set off one Sunday, with boat in tow, for the bay, but it wasn’t toward the Paihia beach, which was only a twenty-minute drive. We were heading for the Rawhiti beach, where no “loopies” IE: tourist – would know how to get to. It took us three hours on winding metal (loose gravel) roads; roads I learned afterwards are ones the rental car companies forbid their customers to travel upon. We did finally arrive on this fine summer day and I for one had a queasy stomach from the drive and nothing in the packed picnic basket looked appetizing. Time soon came for “the men” to depart to collect fresh scallops and crayfish. My father-in-law was at the back of the dinghy in charge of the motor. His son, who was a hulking specimen of a young man, sat at the bow with all of his dive gear; tanks, spears, knife etc. This left a small bit of room between two of them for me to sit in this metal row boat. My attendance was important, though. My being there meant a larger haul could be legally brought back to shore. The trip out to near the middle of the bay was mostly uneventful. Both knew where they wanted to go to get the best results from our venture. Within an hour of our anchoring, though, the winds picked up and began to blow inward creating a choppy surf. It was determined that our fishing was down for the afternoon and all was brought aboard and the boat was turned toward the shore. We weren’t long in our return before the waves began to crash over our weighted-down dinghy. I was instructed to bale water like my life depended upon it. Even with two of us baling madly, it seemed to make little difference. My father-in-law determined that if he asked the engine for “all it had”, the boat would then sit more on top of the waves. In him doing so, we all ended up being thrown from the boat, which now was upturned in the water. I was wearing a wetsuit, and only a wetsuit. I had a natural built-in buoyancy, but my father-in-law, who couldn’t swim, was clinging precariously to his upturned dinghy watching his boat’s motor totally submerse itself in salt water. Meanwhile, the young lad was feverishly free diving in an attempt to rescue his gear which was sinking fast to the thirty-meter depths below us. I actually had a fear that we would be spending the night bobbing up and down in this cold water and the possible outcome if this would become a reality. To our eternal good fortune, a pleasure yacht came cruising within sight and motored over to rescue us. Much to do was made of the fact that whilst we had lost everything in this tragedy, I still had my “sunnies” clinging to my head. Also, the wife of the yacht’s skipper was insistent that I peel off my wetsuit and get dry whilst their returning us to the shore. I was just as adamant the zipper of the suit wasn’t going down. This was no time to be seen in the nutty. 

While my time in and around the Bay of Islands provide many stories to retell, where I spent most of my time in the area was at Ruapekapeka Pa, “pa” meaning Māori village. It is an historic Māori village. It was this village twelve miles out from Kawakawa that the British could not conquest during the New Zealand Wars. The Treaty of Waitangi turned to custard, as it would be said in the local vernacular. The Māori Chiefs who had no more declared the signing of the treaty – He iwi tahi tatou - “we are one people” before bad blood developed with Māori realizing that they were being ripped off by the British who were supposed to be their protectors. Ruapekapeka sits on elevated land and the Māori had created one of the most complex fortifications here; one the British couldn’t penetrate even with their 32 and 18 pounder cannons, 12-pound howitzers and 6-pound brass guns. The British began a cannonade of the hill on December 27, 1845 – the middle of their summer. And, even with the siege, the attack was unsuccessful due to the fortifications and the fact and that the village was all underground. My father-in-law first worked the Ruapekapeka farm land that surrounds this historic pa site for his friend, and when his friend, Bert, who was the last remaining indigenous owner passed away, the farm land was then bequeathed to our family. This is what had me on the site, mostly baling hay and feeding out. It was hard for me, the historian, to reconcile these once interconnected holes in the ground, ones which I was jumping into to above my waist, were once the entry way to the famous Māori village. Then there was Bert, one hundred fifty years later, still digging up cannon balls from the battle. It is a place where one should be filled with awe. 

I looked from this elevated site in the direction of the Bay of Islands to visualize the approach of the British, and mentally re-enact the two-week siege and battle that took place. No battle plan could effectively roust the Māori warriors of the Ngāpuhi iwi, who were led by Hone Heke and Te Ruki Kawiti, off this prime defensive post. However, it was on the Sunday morning, January 11, 1846, when the British sent scouts to assess whether the Māori were at their pa site. Determining that the Māori were absent and attending their European-inspired church service, the British decided to attack the pa. The Māori were indeed not at their pa because they assumed the missionary-driven British would be at church as well. The British ended up burning Ruapekapeka Pa to an unrecognizable Māori village.  

The New Zealand Wars were eventually won by the British and an uneasy “truce” has existed ever since within the country. This is why Waitangi Day ceremonies traditionally are a platform for Māori protestors, despite an overarching effort to foster an atmosphere of “we are one people”, to voice their opposition to The Treaty. This year’s Waitangi Day ceremony being no different as protesters collectively turned their back toward the government’s elected representative as he began to speech.  

Whether they be in peaceful protest, or enjoying a relaxing day on the beach, I’m remembering all of my kiwi family and friends here and abroad – Happy Waitangi Day!   

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

Resolving things

This time of year is as good as any at resolving things, and it's just not me who thinks this way. Four thousand years ago the Babylonians, while celebrating their festival of Akitu, thought it might be a good idea to make resolutions to their gods. Their reasoning being, if they could keep their resolute promises throughout the year, the gods in turn then would treat them favorably. 

So, New Year's resolutions started out having little to do with one’s own personal improvement, but more of a bargain; if I do this, then you’ll grant me that.  

I wonder how much luck played into the Babylonian’s success at being granted the favor they craved? Today, one might resolve to earn or win a million dollars this year and, by using the Babylonian method, you could make a New Year’s resolution to buy a lottery ticket each day as your promise of being diligent. However, I’m not convinced that the “statistical gods” are going to reward you for keeping your promise. While I don’t like your odds, conversely, you have to be in to win. Therefore, I’m resolving things. I haven’t done this in a long time; been too busy. My take is this: you’re better off at least having a road map of where you want to go, right? 

I’m not sure, though, that 2025 is simply a matter of where I want to go. Must admit, I’ve never felt discernment like this before. I’ve not been known necessarily as a look-before-you-leap kind of guy, but 2025 just feels different. It’s not a feeling of fear, but more of caution and extreme uncertainty. I normally charge into a new year, but I feel like I’m tiptoeing into 2025. As an example, think how one feels when entering a supposedly vacant house. You quietly make your way down the hall, checking each room in hope of verifying that nothing or nobody is there to alarm you, however, acknowledging your concern for what’s around the next corner.  

So, I can map out my new year in any way that I want, but something tells me I better use chalk. Here’s my list: 

  1. My extended family are expecting new additions in 2025, a girl and a boy. No added pressure, but he will be the family’s first grandson. My role is to be the supportive “Poppa”, and I can get better at this. However, being made over with eye glitter is where my wife, “Mimi” excels and I have no desire to compete with her in this respect.  

  1. Here I’m repeating a mantra I posted earlier from an Akron, Ohio lady, “time will always be your most valuable asset.” I want to get better in 2025 at calibrating my usage of time so that I’m never too busy for family and friends and this especially includes caring to my mother in her continued rehabilitation. 

  1. It’s a delicate balance actually, reserving time for yourself as well as for others. That’s why I’m resolving to take more time to smell the roses, just not spray, prune and fertilize them this year. Besides, I have a glasshouse that needs erecting so that I can nurture seedlings into plants for our garden. This should reduce the number of trips to Lowes! 

  1. Similarly, I resolve to avoid the upcoming Trump tariff tax wherever I can. I’m already seeing the price of things increase by 30% and 40% in advance of the 2025 tax hike. My plan is to simply make my own or do without, and this could be a difficult promise to uphold. It might mean going without my beloved homemade guacamole for quite some time. 

  1. I’m also resolving to turn off the news channels. Yes, I’m volunteering to personally disconnect from all of the chaos that’s about to descend upon Washington D.C. Let those within the inner belt duke it out, just don’t mess with my family being able to sit around our fire pit undisturbed. And yes, I’m admitting that I’m removing myself from the reality of it all. 

  1. No, I don’t feel a need to apologize to the world for what is about to happen. Others understand and are already pitying us here in the U.S. 

  1. Here’s a recent development: to continue my active surveillance of my medical condition and utilize the opinions of the professionals, and my own common sense, to begin medical intervention when it is necessary. 

  1. I’m resolving to continue to seek solace in my seven thousand Spotify songs so that I can fall back to sleep at 2 am. 

  1. Ok, I’ve left the most challenging resolution until now. I resolve to send to my publisher the manuscript of my sequel by years’ end. I might need someone like my niece again, to hold me to this pledge. 

  1. And finally, here’s one to either make you smile or grimace. I resolve to continue posting my musings and random thoughts in this monthly blog, and as always, welcome your input. 

These aren’t the 10 Commandments nor the 10 Suggestions, but more akin to the yardstick that gets taped to the kitchen wall to see how you measure up at the end of the year. 

Wishing health, prosperity and glad tidings to all this year.   

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

The Glass Ceiling

Thirty days have passed, which has given me time for reflection and consideration of the adjustments that lie before us in our new reality. 

Here in America, I seem to always make more progress with my research and writing during the winter months. Weather and the lack of garden to attend to probably account for this additional “author time”. I’m currently drafting the chapter in my upcoming historical fiction sequel, The Gilded Age, that relates to the Irish immigrant's entry into this country during the 19th century. The more fortunate and entrepreneurial Irish settlers arrived in this country during the 1820-1830's. This is the group that my ancestors belong to. However, from the 1840-1870's, a potato famine occurred in the Emerald Isle causing hundreds of thousands of deaths from starvation. Still, no fewer than 1.5 million Irish were able to escape and arrive on our eastern seaboard.  

The Irish immigrants were not welcomed due to their willingness to work for lower wages. They displaced many of the African Americans on the east coast of their jobs. There were other Irish who moved inland, mostly through Pennsylvania and West Virginia, and were put to work in coal mines. The story is told of how mine workers back then were mainly divided into two groups, “Miners” and “Mine Workers”. “Miners” were mainly those from England and Wales and men who had been working the coal fields for some time before the arrival of the Irish. A caste system was carried over from the old days in Europe whereby the Irish immigrants became “mine workers”. Both miners and mine workers reported to work by 7am, the miners entering the shaft to free the coal from the seam face, and they were usually finished by lunch time, leaving of course, the mine workers to pile up the lumps, sometimes filling three to four cars, before the end of their shift at 6pm. It was not uncommon for the mine workers to spend most of their day working in waist-deep water and for their troubles, receive only one third of the pay for their labor. 

Irish immigrants were also used to fill up the factories that were burgeoning at that time in history. They also were instrumental in laying the railroad track for the Union Pacific Railway, which opened up the entire country in 1869. Needless to say, Irish lives were expendable and these immigrants were surely underappreciated for their hard labor. Matter of fact, they were despised and maligned. Most were condescendingly called “Bridget” and worse. The Irish labor activists, otherwise known as “Molly Maguires”, who were petitioning management within these large companies for better working conditions, were tracked down, prosecuted, and sentenced to death. The Irish mine workers who were either crushed by collapsing shafts or suffocated by leaking gases within the earth, were subject to a more excruciating death. And yet, it was the public’s prejudice against them as immigrants that affected all of the Irish. They were referred to as “damned drunken, ignorant papist”. At least the immigrants from this period of our history weren’t castigated as murderers and rapists who eat cats and dogs, which is the malarky we’ve just been witness to recently. 

In H.W. Brand’s book, “American Colossus”, he addresses another late 19th century prejudice in the chapter, “Meet Jim Crow”. Brand highlights the story of Ida Wells who was born into a slave family, eventually goes to live with her aunt in Tennessee, and becomes a school teacher. One day while traveling on the Chesapeake, Ohio & Southwestern train, the conductor had her physically removed from her first-class seat and placed in the smoking car against her will. A court case followed in which Ida was awarded $500 compensation for her troubles, only to have the Tennessee Supreme Court reverse the lower court’s order. Ida had to return the $500 award and ended up paying $200 in court costs. The famed Booker Washington weighed in on this incident, but in the end admitted that conscience might motivate some folks, but conscience is fickle. Brand writes, “Democracy was even less reliable than conscience ... (and) that democracy sooner or later expressed the will of the majority, whatever courts or constitutional amendments might declare. ... Blacks were a minority in America and always would be; for them to demand what the majority wasn’t ready to give was to spit into the wind.”  

Chief Justice John Marshall Harlan had his own thoughts on the subject. He would write the majority opinion (7-1) in the Plessy v Ferguson case stating that segregation did not perpetuate race prejudice. Quoting, “This prejudice, if it exists, is not created by law mandating separate railcars for the two races.” Justice Harlan alluded to a Pennsylvania Supreme Court case in his remarks, "To assert separateness is not to declare inferiority ... It is simply to say that following the order of Divine Providence, human authority ought not to compel these widely separated races to intermix.” Thus, began the “Separate but Equal” policy that became the law of the land in the United States. The Civil Rights legislation of the 1960’s officially struck down this notion that a separate section on public transport or restroom facility or even a drinking fountain could be passed off as equal. However, legislation didn’t change the prejudices that lie deep-seeded in the minds of many Americans. I attended a school in a small, almost entirely Caucasian community. I can attest that our schools were very much different than the mostly black community’s ones not too far down the road. A full decade after acknowledging separate is not equal, nothing much has changed the minds of the people.  

I have a confession to make. I was one of them. Back in 1980 I was attending university and was loosely aware that women had finally been granted their right to vote. The 19th Amendment to our Constitution was inserted on August 18, 1920. What I didn’t know was that many other countries around the world had already made this mental leap, that women should be considered “equal” enough to have the right to vote. By the way, New Zealand was the first self-governing country in the world in which the women had the right to vote. With Lord Glasgow’s signing off the “New Electoral Act” on September 19, 1893, the proverbial glass ceiling had been busted open. It just took Americans twenty-seven years to come to grips with this concept. It wasn’t for the lack of trying, as I write in my upcoming sequel how Susan B. Anthony crashed the Independence Day ceremony at the Centennial Fair in Philadelphia. She and two friends read their own version of the declaration of independence whilst the officials looked on in disbelief and a cannonade was exploding in the background in celebration of the moment. 

Back to my confession. I was fortunate to be an official attendee of the 1980 Republican Convention in Detroit. That was the one which first nominated Ronald Reagan. The evening events were concluded late and I was traveling by public transport back to my vehicle miles away. It was well past midnight. The bus was full of Republicans and I recall one lady turning to me and asking why I was wearing a button against the proposed ERA Amendment being added to the party’s platform? I knew the “party line” by heart and began the recitation I had been taught. She wasn’t buying the argument that women weren’t equal. Here’s a synopsis of what she and a few others refused to buy in to: “That the ERA conflicted with the God-given differences between men and women and disregarded traditional family and gender roles embedded in their religious beliefs.” Phyllis Schlafly was the most outspoken anti-ERA proponent. Her claim was that God’s mission for women was to give their families spiritual and emotional guidance and the Equal Rights Amendment threatened this mission and would also force women to question their value. Who else was pushing this appeal to men’s natural disposition to prejudice? - any number of religious groups including that of the fundamentalist Christians and the Catholic Church. 

Neither this pro-ERA woman nor I officially won over each other in our late-night debate, but I certainly could not have been considered a winner when I realized after she got off at her stop, that my car was in a lot two stops back! Yes, I was dropped off at some obscure Detroit neighborhood and had to find my way back at 12:30am. That was some penitence that I deserved and may elaborate on in a future blog, but I can vouch that people even today will hold on to their prejudice that women should not be treated equally in society, within the family, nor the workplace. I will never live down the shame I carry from that awful bus ride. 

So, reflecting back on the election result some thirty days ago. What chance did a daughter of a mix-raced immigrant family have of becoming the President of the United States? All good children are schooled up that anyone can become president in this land of opportunities, but what is the reality? How or when will these glass ceilings that hang over our nation’s immigrants, our citizens who aren’t Caucasian, and in general, women? If the rumblings coming out of our post-election/pre-inauguration are any indication, this current seemingly impenetrable glass ceiling is going to get double-paned. I sincerely hope that this isn’t the case, but we’re working with long-held, deep-seeded prejudices becoming once again du jour. I guess only time will tell.  

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

The Contested Election

With voting for the presidential election to be finalized this Tuesday, my hope is for the candidate who loses to display foresight and character with a timely concession speech. This has not always been the case. An example of a refusal to concede is found in the actions of those who stormed the Capitol Building on January 6, 2021, an act of treason if there ever was one. Spare us a repeat of all this election denial ballyhoo and let’s get on with business.  

Before January 6th, there was November 7, 1876!  

In my upcoming sequel, “The Gilded Age” - www.beckleysbooks.com - I delve into the effect the 1876 Presidential Election had on all of our ancestors who lived locally during this time period. Roughly five years after the fateful 1876 election (1880), and with promoting of Northeast Ohio’s favorite son, James A. Garfield, into the White House, the local democrats were still fuming over the election that had been stolen from them in 1876. The Democratic mouthpiece, The Carroll Chronicle, was still dredging up “the theft” and reminding folks pretty much on a weekly basis.  

A look back at what transpired in the early morning hours of November 8, 1876, and the months that followed, gives us an understanding of why the Democrats were so passionate and why they felt aggrieved for so long. Here’s what went down, by all historical account. 

The Republican Party nominated Rutherford B. Hayes, the Governor of Ohio, who was a placid, but outgoing individual. Kenneth E. Davison’s biographical sketch of Hayes tells us of the Kenyon College student walking 40 miles to his family’s home in Delaware, Ohio one Christmas. Hayes later met and married the renown women’s activist, Lucy Webb, who became one of the more gifted First Ladies, and the first to be a college grad. “She was an excellent hostess; her outgoing personality complemented her husband’s more reserved manner.”, Davison writes. Rutherford Hayes was not his party’s first choice for president, but after seven ballots, he was considered the perfect compromise candidate from their primary convention held in Cincinnati that year.  

The Democrats coalesced around the Governor of New York, Samuel Tilden. Tilden’s appeal, according to author Roy Morris Jr., was his being a cerebral politician, an intellectual who did not devolve into the personal side of a campaign, but otherwise embodied a self-aloofment. “Centennial Sam” at 62, looked a good ten years older. He was short and slight of stature with sparse sandy hair, a pale complexion, and an odd drooping left eyelid. Is there any surprise that he was a bachelor? 

My read on this election is that neither party’s candidate got personally involved with the eventual outcome, but, Hayes’ “essential rectitude” allowed him to overlook the evidence of electoral misbehavior by some of his closest friends and supporters. 

Meanwhile, Tilden realized, despite securing 1.3 million more votes than his opponent, the election was being stolen from him. Tilden also understood how one ill-chosen word might reignite the country into civil war. Morris Jr. writes, “Tilden had the good grace and inherent patriotism to avert such a social catastrophe.”  

This is a tale that might sound eerily familiar. It starts with a political operative, Daniel Sickles – aka “Dirty Dan” - who had been a Democrat and was a rising star under the James Buchanan administration. That was until Sickles effectively ruined his career by killing the son of Francis Scott Key, whom had been having an affair with his wife. Sickles used his connections through Edwin Stanton, the future War Secretary, to secure an acquittal. Roy Morris Jr., in his best-selling book, “Fraud of the Century”, notes that Stanton, in this legal brief, was the first lawyer to use the argument of “temporary insanity”.  

Sickles salvaged his reputation by raising and leading a Union brigade during the Civil War, losing a leg at Gettysburg, but winning a Medal of Honor for his efforts. Then, after the war, Sickles was appointed as Military Command of the Reconstruction District encompassing North and South Carolina, before having been removed once President Grant appointed him as an “American Minister” to Spain. Sickles had to resign this foreign post after having become too familiar with the Queen of Spain and thereafter, he moved to Paris. It was from his residence in Paris where Sickles wrote to his American contacts of his concern for a Tilden presidency. Oddly enough, the National Republican Chairman, Zachariah Chandler, declined Sickles’ offer of help, but this did not deter him from returning and settling in New York City. 

On the night of November 7th, Sickles was returning from a Broadway play when he stopped at the hotel of the Republican Headquarters on 23rd Street. He was expecting a hive of activity, but found none; only a disheartened clerk, M.C. Clancy, as everyone else had retired for the night fully expecting a Democratic Party victory in the morning. Morris Jr. describes in his book how Sickles sat at the chairman’s desk and “riffled through a stack of telegrams from Republican State Headquarters across the country. What he saw gave him hope.” Sickles mentioned to the clerk that the presidential contest was “really close ...  doubtful, but by no means hopeless.” 

Sickles turned his astute eyes on the Electoral College tally and instantly knew that in three states, Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina, where Republicans still held power through governorships and reconstructive governmental power, he could raise the “slightest air of uncertainty”. Sickles then drafted a message to each of those three states’ party’s chairmen restating, “With your State sure for Hayes, he is elected. Hold your State.” What Sickles needed next was the clerk, Clancy, to forge Chairman Chandler’s signature on the messages. Clerk Clancy was skeptical of the scheme until the powerful and current Collector of the Port of New York, and future President of the USA, Chester A. Arthur appeared. Sickles posed his scheme to Arthur, and under Arthur’s direction, the deceptive telegrams were sent. 

Rumors abound as early as 3:45am on the morning of November 8th and worried Democratic officials sought to allay their fears with a wired, urgent message to the Editor of the New York Times, “Answer at once!”. They were enquiring about the returns from Florida, Louisiana and South Carolina. Meanwhile by daylight, the Associated Press was reporting that both sides were declaring victory in Florida. Also, at the break of day, came back a reply to Sickles’ telegraph from the South Carolina Governor - “South Carolina is for Hayes”. Sickles sent more messages to his Florida and Louisiana operatives telling them, despite nearly every U.S. newspaper declaring Tilden the winner, “to hold your State.” And with that, Sickles duties were done. 

The New York Times continued to sow seeds of doubt upon the election’s results with their morning headline - “A Doubtful Election”.  The New York Herald followed with “The Result – What Is It? The Returns Too Meager.” 

The Democrats counted firmly on 17 States and 184 Electoral College votes while the Republicans held 18 States and 166 Electoral College votes, leaving 3 States and 19 Electoral College votes in dispute. For the record, Tilden won all three disputed States with the initial returns, and some by a large margin like the 7757-vote majority in Louisiana. Fear was rampant, though, of what these states’ Returning Boards would finally do.  

Tilden’s campaign manager, Abram Hewitt, drafted a memo encouraging Americans to assemble at various points around the country “to protest against the frauds, which have been committed, and to express their determination that the people should not be robbed of their choice for President.” Tilden was unmoved and refused to release the message stating, “it would be safe to trust to the sense of Justice, which sooner or later, would show itself in the public mind and make the consummation of the fraud impossible.” Privately, Tilden’s closest confident ranted, “Another civil war may be the consequence of this state of things and we may enter upon the next century under a different form of government from that of which for nearly a century we have been boasting.” And despite Tilden being bombarded with private wires to act, he remained unmoved. “Be satisfied with reflection that the people are too patriotic, too intelligent, too self-poised to allow anything perilous to be done that may disturb or destroy our peculiar form of government.”, Tilden replied confidently. Meanwhile, seven additional companies of soldiers were moved to protect Washington after rumors that the Democrats were arming themselves to march on the city and install Tilden by force. 

Bayonet-wielding soldiers were also beginning to camp around the capitols of Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina as supporters from both sides arrived to review and oversee the vote certification. All three states’ Returning Boards set their deliberations for mid-November with an eye on a deadline of December 6th to certify their state’s votes. Each state followed a similar format. First, investigators would be dispatched to the counties where the Republican-led boards felt voters were coerced or threatened to vote the Democratic ticket. As an example, in Louisiana, 300 witnesses were rounded up by soldiers and brought before the board members to tell their tales of alleged Democratic abuse. After these hearings were conducted by each state’s commission, the board members would remove the overseers and go into a secret session. 

Not surprisingly, some members of each state’s Returning Boards approached Tilden operatives seeking sizable bribes in exchange for their vote to confirm the Tilden vote count. Once again as an example, in Louisiana, a group of board members approached the Tilden campaign representative seeking $250,000 – one hundred thousand for both of the white members and twenty-five thousand for each of the two negro members. Despite these overtures, no bribery money was paid to any Returning Board members of any state. 

The South Carolina Board’s final determination was to disregard two State Supreme Court orders and invalidate all votes from three Democrat-leaning counties, which gave Hayes a 7-vote margin in their Electoral College tally. Tilden previously held a 1-vote winning margin. The South Carolinian Board then adjourned placing them out of reach of further legal mandates. The Court issued warrants for the members’ arrest for contempt of court, but their stay behind bars was mitigated by a sympathetic magistrate, who simply released them from custody. 

In Louisiana, their Reporting Board invalidated 15,623 votes, of which 13,211 were cast for Tilden. This action made Hayes the winner of their State. From the Board’s secret and final session, these results were released three days later citing systematic intimidation, murder and violence toward one class of voter as the reason for their decision. 

The Florida Returning Board, meeting in secret session and protected by armed guards, tossed more than 1800 Tilden votes to give Hayes a majority of 924 votes in their State’s final tally. 

December 6th arrived and in 38 State Capitols across the country, the Electoral College vote took place. In 34 of the 38 States, the votes tallied as per on election night. In the three aforementioned States, plus Oregon, two separate election certificates were filed. Not counting the 4 aberrant States, Tilden still had 184 votes and Hayes 165. The remaining 22 votes were mired in contradiction by separate election certificates having been signed by various governors, governors-presumptive, secretaries of states or as in one instance, signed by nobody at all. Through all of this, nothing had been decided. 

At this point a frustrated Tilden lashed out, “Our Presidential Election has been subverted by a false count of votes cast by Presidential Electors, found on a substitution of pretended votes known at the time to be fraudulent or forced and to have been manufactured for that particular use.” Tilden feared that his country had become “a bad copy of the worst government of the worst ages.” 

The question then became, what would the Senate Majority Leader, Thomas Ferry, do as Acting President of The U.S. Senate? This is normally a role given to the Vice President, but Grant’s VP, Henry W. Wilson, had died the previous year, so Ferry had been filling in since then. Ferry and the other Senators were unsure if the 12th Amendment to the Constitution meant that he was supposed to open the Electoral College votes and count them, or was this just a ceremonial role he had signed up for? And in a situation like this, where there were two different sets of votes from four states, was he supposed to declare which set of votes were to be counted and which ones to set aside? The Democrats wanted Ferry to perform the ceremonial role of simply opening the votes and announcing Tilden 185 Hayes 164. In this case, neither candidate having a majority of the 371 total, the contest then would be automatically thrown into the House of Representatives, where the Democrats held a majority and Tilden would surely win.  

What actually transpired was this. Two competing resolutions, one from the Democratic House and the other from the Republican Senate passed each chamber one day after the arrival of the Electoral College votes. Each resolution created a “bipartisan” committee to study ways to resolve this mess. The House committee consisted of 4 Democrats and 3 Republicans and the Senate committee consisted of 4 Republicans and 3 Democrats. The deliberations began, but the two opposing candidates for president used this lull in the proceedings to take two opposite courses of action. The bookworm-ish Tilden dug into reams of legal research to prove legally his rightful claim as the President. Meanwhile, Hayes began to personally reach out to Congressmen who would ultimately be deciding his fate. Then, a twist in events occurred where it was agreed that both legislative committees would combine, now with an equal number of party members represented at the table. The design of this action was to select members for just one committee, a group who would then effectively choose the next President. After three days of vigorous debate, it was agreed that this new committee would consist of 5 Democratic Congressmen and Senators and, 5 Republican Congressmen and Senators, 2 Democrat Supreme Court Justices and 2 Republican Justices, and a fifth Justice who would be chosen by the other four Justices. All parties to this agreement had in mind an “Independent” Justice by the name of David Davis, to take up this fifth spot of the Electoral Committee. However, after the committee had been empaneled, Davis accepted the position to represent Illinois in the US Senate and therefore refused the nomination to be seated as the fifth Justice on the committee. In a scurry, the four seated Justices decided to choose the recently Grant-appointed Supreme Court Justice, Joseph P. Bradley, to take the final seat on the committee. Hayes’ campaign manager informed his boss that Bradley “was as safe as either of the other Republican Judges.” 

The Electoral committee commenced with hearings, which droned on through February 6th, when it finally went into executive session for private deliberations. Not long after, the vote took place and the Committee voted along party lines to not receive any more evidence and no further investigations. The Democrats realized at this moment that the selection of Justice Bradley had tipped the scales in Hayes favor. On February 8th, the Electoral Commission awarded the contested votes from all four States to Hayes and he thereafter took up residence in the White House as the President of the United States of America.  

Contested elections since 1876 have also occurred in 2000 and 2020. With all the angst and chatter surrounding this upcoming election, why has it recently become in vogue to assume this 2024 election will be contested too? 

On October 27th, CNN released results from a poll where just over 30% of the registered voters said that Donald Trump will accept the results of the election and concede if he loses. 73% felt that Vice President Kamala Harris would accept an election loss. This is ominous and staggering to me, but don’t accept my “biased” opinion on this issue. Here’s what a New York Times Opinion Columnist, David French, wrote on October 24th about Trump’s election reversal dreams. “The legal arguments Donald Trump used to try to reverse the election outcome in 2020 have been decisively rejected and the legal loopholes he tried to open have been closed.” French goes on to explain how the Trump Team used the “Conspiracy Theory” to ignite rage that led to the “Coup Theory”, the actual legal mechanism for overturning the election. The Trump Team also arranged for slates of fake electors to be ready to cast ballots for Trump the instant that State Legislatures invalidated the original election results, French pens. The Electoral Count Act of 1887 gives any single Senator or Congressman the right to object to the certification of a state’s vote count. The Act does not define the grounds, though, for overturning a state’s election, and this is what gave the MAGA Team some hope that their scheme might work. 

As we know, then Vice President Pence refused to play his part as Presiding Officer of the Senate and, Trump’s efforts failed because of this. French writes, “If Pence had declared Trump the victor, we would have potentially seen two different presidents sworn in on the same day.” French’s article goes into depth explaining how if Trump can once again persuade tens of millions of Americans that the election was stolen, his legal options have narrowed considerably.  

French concludes his article by saying, “I want to be very clear – I'm not writing this to say that we have nothing to worry about in 2024. Sadly, legal reform might even make political violence more likely. Trump’s team knows that it’s now virtually impossible to reverse an election outcome through the Courts or Congress. They’ll file their frivolous lawsuits, of course, but they may believe that their last hope is in the streets ... I’d be surprised if the post-election period is entirely peaceful ... but nothing and no one can foreclosure the possibility of political violence. If Trump loses again, chaos is his last – and most dangerous – card to play.” 

Wow! It’s hard to believe we’ve come to this, our place, in the annals of history. My opinion is, placing aside the patriotic platitudes (Duty – Honor – Country) that are espoused by all political parties and their loyalist supporters, let’s take a hard look at what our country has been, and where our nation can go from here, and reject the vain attempt of men who attempt to wield political power in this country at all cost.  

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

Here’s Something Different

Mores are usually described as social norms, which basically determine what is acceptable or unacceptable within any given society or culture. I briefly touch on the social mores of the mid-19th century in my historical fiction, “Oh! Susannah” - www.beckleysbooks.com , when I outline the dilemma my 3rd great grandmother found herself in. Back then, twenty-one was a very important age for young unmarried women. Many of their friends by that time in their lives were either betrothed or engaged. Turning twenty-two years of age, women found eligible bachelors choosing girls younger then them, some as young as 14 or 15 years old. The social norms of the time had Susannah Reigle having to choose between marrying someone who was her father’s age, and who also had character issues, or resigning herself to be celibate and single for the rest of her life. She had a decision to make, one that was clearly put before her by the time period’s accepted societal norms.

I was 13 years old in the early 1970’s and was being reared by a respectable family. My father had been a volunteer fireman, an elected councilman, and a church elder. With these “high profile” positions within our small village, there also came an expected behavior from his family members, social mores.

The time clock was ticking for me, but I never heard it! There were conversations at the dinner table about baptism, but I didn’t take the remarks as being directed at me seeing how we were in church twice on Sunday, and usually one night during the week and also had “devotions” nearly every week night during the summer. “Baptism” was just all part and parcel of my everyday life. I suppose in my subconscious, I considered baptism an “a la carte” option, kind of like squeezing the hand of the person on your left during a devotion's prayer circle. If I didn’t feel like saying a prayer, one quick squeeze, and I was passed over.

My parents tried the gentle persuasion approach, casually mentioning that come Sunday, when the preacher called for anyone to come forward to be baptized, “someone” from our family should “answer the call”. I felt the hint, but come that Sunday, I sat quite stoically in the pew, despite our minister’s superb message. This wasn’t the case, though, of my youngest sister who was up and on her way down the aisle to be baptized before the hem of her Sunday dress got tugged and she was smartly back in our pew. I guess the “gentle persuasion” approach backfired.

Next came the “Q & A” session. My parents first reminding me how all of my church friends were turning 13 and getting baptized.

Q: Did I believe in Jesus?

A: Yes

Q: Was I afraid of being dunked in the water?

A: No. I knew how to swim and hold my breath under water

Q: Was I afraid of all the church members watching me?

A: I suppose not

Q: Did I want to be the only person in my Sunday School class who wasn’t baptized?

A: I don’t know

Talk about bringing all of the social mores to bear!

Then, in a final desperate attempt, my parents sat me down in a “one-on-one" negotiation. It started out something like this, “You need to do this of your own free will ...”

I’m hoping that the God Almighty is heaping blessings on the first person I ever knew as a minister, Arthur Guy. He was a wonderful person who succeeded in his mission in life, to bring people to Jesus Christ through baptism. Mr. Guy gave up one of his summer mid-week evenings to cater to my eccentricities and put my family out of their misery by baptizing me in an empty sanctuary, save my father, mother and siblings sitting in the first pew.

Running concurrently with this “baptism debacle” was another struggle I was enduring at 13. A few months into having started middle school and I had my routine down; arrive – locker – then up the cavernous stairwell to my first class. Then one day, I was momentarily stopped while ascending the stairs by a pretty girl who turned out to be a year older than me. She was passing on her way down when our eyes met and the gaze was like taking a snapshot of our souls. She handed me a note, which had been neatly folded origami-style, and then dashed away. I read the note during my lunch break and was thunderstruck by her words, which said that she “liked” me and wanted to be my friend. Once home, I re-read her note so many times, finding it difficult to concentrate on my homework, before hiding it within my desk. The next day there was another encounter with Miss K and each of the school days thereafter until she finally asked, in desperation, if I had any intent on replying in kind? I was jolted into realizing just how rude I had been and began swapping notes with her, but not on a one-to-one basis. I treasured these letters and was anticipating how I would miss getting these over our Christmas break. And then, my secret affair was cruelly exposed over dinner, my parents with my “love letters’ clutched in their hands, announced that I had a girlfriend! My mother in cleaning my room had discovered my stash and now the unmerciful teasing and ridicule would begin. There was the inquisition to which I simply held to my 5th amendment rights to remain silent, but it was now obvious that the letters had to end. I didn’t want the letter exchange to end but my family’s sense of social mores meant that this had to end.

Back at school, I altered my routine, essentially avoiding Miss K, who had no clue what had changed. I hid in the band room, used deserted hallways, but she was persistent and usually found me. She enlisted friends who were also church acquaintances of mine, and despite all the external pressure from well-meaning people, I couldn’t find a solution to my internal turmoil. That is, until one day, when I was passed a seating chart to sign up with your buddy for the band bus on an upcoming trip. I was surprised to see my name had already been written in, next to Miss K, by someone other than me. I approached the band director after practice to explain what had happened and this is what caused the director to withdraw the seating chart and admonish the entire band over the seating issue. “Oh, what a mess!”, I thought. “How did it come to this?”

Needless to say, the letters ceased after our not being seat mates on that trip, and I sincerely regretted this decision I had made under duress. Looking back, I’m unsure what prompted me to attend the school dance on the last day of school. Hopeful? Afraid of missing another opportunity? It mattered not for I sat the entire night similarly glued to the wooden folding chair, just as securely as the chair was bolted into the concrete below me. I watched as others danced in the dimly lit cavernous gymnasium, the same venue my mother and father had danced in years before as high school sweethearts. The lights eventually came on and I walked home with only my thoughts, having not spoken to anyone the entire night. It was the start of a melancholy summer. By that Fall, with Miss K now in high school, I noticed her on her school bus leaving one day and I made sure to be there at that exact time in my walk home each day, but for no purpose. Years passed, Miss K had just graduated and I was working at the local grocery store in the butcher’s shop. One day I looked up to assist the next customer and our eyes locked and the gaze was just as it had been in the first instance, both of us surprised to see each other. I handed her the pound of baloney she had requested and then she turned and walked away without a further word exchanged, our paths never to cross again.

People say things come in lots of three, and during my unlucky 13th year, we received word of my great aunt, Miss Robart’s hospitalization. Our family all knew her affectionately as “Bubu” and she was particularly fond of me, as I was of her. Miss Robart was a Christian Scientist, and certainly, as a matter of faith, she would not be in a hospital! In the parlance of a small town, non-medically attuned family, the news was announced that “Bubu was riddled with cancer. They had opened her up and sewn her back up again.”

It was during this time that music became my salve and my soul took solace in the angst found in these lyrics. The song was not written about me, but for me.

“At Seventeen” - Janis Ian

I learned the truth at seventeen

That love was meant for beauty queens

And high school girls with clear-skinned smiles

Who married young and then retired

The valentines I never knew

The Friday night charades of youth

Were spent on one more beautiful

At seventeen I learned the truth

And those of us with ravaged faces

Lacking in the social graces

Desperately remained at home

Inventing lovers on the phone

Who called to say “come dance with me”

And murmured vague obscenities

It isn’t all it seems at seventeen

A brown-eyed girl in hand me downs

Whose name I never could pronounce

Said “Pity please the ones who serve

They only get what they deserve”

The rich-relationed hometown queen

Married into what she needs

With a guarantee of company

And haven for the elderly

So remember those who win the game

Lose the love they sought to gain

In debitures of quality and dubious integrity

Their small-town eyes will gape at you

In dull surprise when payment due

Exceeds accounts received at seventeen

To those of us who knew the pain

Of valentines that never came

And those whose names were never called

When choosing sides for basketball

It was long ago and far away

The world was younger than today

When dreams were all they gave for free

To ugly duckling girls like me.

We all play the game, and when we dare

We cheat ourselves at solitaire

Inventing lovers on the phone

Repenting other lives unknown

That call and say, “come dance with me”

And murmur vague obscenities

At ugly girls like me, at seventeen

Social mores were with us in the 19th century and in the 1970’s and even so today. Fear to comply with acceptable norms, many times enforced by bullies, could be left behind in the schoolyard back then. Now, with the ramped use of social media, the haunting and taunting of innocent victims can carry on 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Sometimes it’s a matter of being unconscious to it. Social mores usually place people within a box where a decision needs to be made, choose “A” or “B”. But, wait! Why can’t there be another option? Take my heroine, Susannah. Why couldn’t she have chosen to hold out for that one gentleman, who it mattered not that she had been passed over by all the others? And yet, at twenty-two, she thought she had only two choices.

Pollsters today ask, “Are you voting for candidate A or candidate B? Some brave souls say, “I’m unsure.”, which places them in the “undecided” column and then the media really pounce seeking a decision.

There are more than two choices when marking your ballot paper. Candidate A and Candidate B and “Neither”, but nobody ever explains it this way! If one candidate is absolutely abhorrent to you and the other, you’re unsure about, you are exercising your right by simply skipping to the next race, with neither box ticked. It’s not like you can’t leave the dinner table until you are finished cleaning your plate of food. You can vote for only those you feel comfortable in doing so, and then leave. You’ve done your civic duty by not voting for someone or something you’re unsure of, and using a party affiliation as your guide is no longer a reliable measure. By the way, what do political party hacks know about running a County Dog Catcher’s office, other than it is another avenue for patronage? So, if you are familiar with what the candidate’s positions are, and want to see them in elected office, mark the box. Otherwise, move on to the next race down the ballot.

How would Susannah’s life had changed had she only known that by holding out, she may have had a third option? How might our elections turn out if people realized that they have a third option? I like the idea of having a choice, if for no other reason, I can look back and evaluate my decision at the time. I guess at 65, it’s as good a time as any to reflect on what might have been had I made a different choice, not in a manner of regret, but more of curiosity.

But alas, we are not going back, but boldly stepping into the future enlightened by all the choices we have before us.

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

The Debate

The Debate 

I don’t remember Mr. Henderson, my Speech teacher and our high school’s Debate Coach, teaching us to debate in the manner in which we witnessed earlier this month, in the 2024 Presidential Debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and Former President Donald Trump. My fear is that the latest presidential debate will be remembered for all of the wrong reasons. And, it’s not like our country is devoid of up and coming, as well as very skilled debaters. First to my mind comes my niece, whom I fondly call “Kaiser”. She is so sweet, at first impression, you’d agree that butter wouldn’t melt in her mouth. During Kaiser’s high school years and now at university, there have been quite a few debate opponents who have misread that beautiful smile she wears. I’m told a number of Kaiser’s debate opponents have trembled at the mention of her name; she is that good at debating! I’m convinced that It is because she is always overly prepared and totally focused on scoring on the merits of her given subject. That’s the “speech and debate” I was taught. 

Once upon a time, orators were national celebrities and folks would walk or ride a horse for over an hour just to hear their speeches. These “meetings” were social events, where attendees also learned firsthand of national events. Take for instance, The Great Triumvirate – Webster, Clay & Calhoun – from the mid 19th century.  

Daniel Webster - “The Godlike Daniel” - had a quality of voice and a “huge chest that could power his miraculous instrument”. Webster was invited to the 50th commemoration of the Battle of Bunker Hill held in Boston on June 17, 1825 where he was sharing the podium with Lafayette. Undaunted by the ceremony, Webster stirred the twenty thousand strong crowd with the closing lines “Let our object be our country, our whole country and nothing but our country.” There was little doubt that this orator would become Senator Webster and he didn’t disappoint what was now a national audience with what historians refer to as his “2nd reply to Hayne”, a two-day speech that resonated in the halls of Congress. “Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable” is still remembered today as the call to action from this Webster speech.  

By 1850, Webster had been joined by Henry Clay from Kentucky. As this pair strove for unity in the country with a number of “Compromise” pieces of legislation, which were all preceded by extraordinary oratory. Daniel Webster is renown for his contribution, “The Constitution and The Union”, which was a three- and half-hour delivery on March 7th.  It is recorded that Webster’s eyes appeared like two balls of fire addressing the topic of secession with great drops of perspiration beaded on his face. 

As good an orator as Daniel Webster was, it is generally agreed that Henry Clay was the better speaker and debater. Clay will forever be remembered as “The Compromiser” for his diligent work in Washington to stitch together the Compromise of 1830 and 1850. It was this latter piece of legislation that drew the last bit of energy from him before his death. His senatorial address, “The Compromise of 1850” lasted over four- and three-quarter hours over two days, allowing the statesman to rest and recharge. I read Robert Remini’s book, “Henry Clay – Stateman for the Union” prior to my visiting his estate, “Ashlands”, in Lexington. It was so poignant to me in my visiting that the mansion had been reconstructed from the rubble found in the outhouse pits on site. The curators have done a superb job of restoration and I could sense Clay’s personality through touring each room. The estimable man who early in his congressional career was clearly frustrated with the “despotic actions” of President Andrew Jackson and spent three days in the senate gallery debating how the President required a censure for his placing “the very existence of liberty and the government in peril. To most observers, Clay’s extemporaneous remarks were falling on the deaf ears of the Vice President, Martin Van Buren, who was quietly reading a book whilst presiding over the chamber during this time. Clay with his voice in full throttle of sarcasm dared Van Buren to address his concerns with the President right that minute. It is recorded that the Vice President summoned another senator to take his speaker’s chair and then stepped onto the floor heading directly toward Clay. A fully packed gallery anxiously awaited a dust up between two of the most prominent politicians in the country. Vice President Van Buren bowed to Henry Clay, and instead of challenging the statesman, asked in a mocking voice if the Senator would “allow me to be indebted to you for another pinch of your aromatic Maccoboy”. Remini writes, “Dumfounded, Clay simply waved his hand toward the gold snuff box he kept on his desk. Van Buren sampled it and then leisurely returned to the chair of the presiding officer.”  

The one common thread with each of these debating forums of years past is the sheer length of their address, nearly all of them measured in hours and audiences who sat through their duration. My publicist keeps reminding me that my reels posted on today’s social media must be kept to 15 seconds. I guess this is progress, eh? 

As the icons of Webster and Clay were fading from the national scene, there was a senator from Illinois, who was there to carry on their legacy. His name was Stephen Douglas, The Little Giant, who was goaded into sharing the stage with an upstart rail splitter from the newly formed Republican party, and thus began the concept of a “debate” for public office. Abraham Lincoln in an effort to rebut the sitting senator, simply showed up in every town after Douglas had delivered his address. Lincoln stated, “it is in fact a concluding speech on him.” Annoyed by Lincoln’s campaigning, Douglas begrudgingly offered to share the stage with the theretofore unknown candidate for Illinois senate seat in 1858. Douglas chose seven venues, prominent points in each congressional district, where he and Lincoln would debate. They agreed that each candidate would begin alternatively with the person going first having one hour to make his case, then the opponent being given ninety minutes in rebuttal before the opening candidate would close the debate with an half hour wrap up. From this foray into political debates came the “Freeport Doctrine” named after the Lincoln/Douglas debate in Freeport, Illinois. The main issue during the campaign was “slavery extension”, which had divided the nation into two hostile camps and threatened the continued existence of the Union. Lincoln in his allotted time in Freeport asked Douglas to reconcile the candidate’s support of “popular sovereignty” with the recently released Dred Scott decision where free slaves would lose their “free” status if taken across state lines. Douglas’ feeble reply was basically, don’t establish these laws in your local communities that protect slave owner’s property. Douglas’ stance on this main issue split the Democrat Party. Douglas narrowly defeated Lincoln in 1858 but lost his stature as a national figure. Meanwhile, a post-debate “bounce” saw Lincoln acclaimed as an eloquent spokesman for his party, one who saw a dominant run by the Republicans from 1860-1884. 

One cannot have a discourse on presidential debates and not mention the first debating contest broadcast on television. Four dates were agreed to by the candidates, Vice President Richard Nixon and Senator John Kennedy. The first debate aired on CBS in Chicago on September 26, 1960 with Howard K. Smith as the moderator. Following were debates in Washington D.C. on October 7th with Frank McGee from NBC moderating, the October 13th debate where Nixon was in Los Angeles and Kennedy showed up in ABC studios in New York City, and the last debate held in New York City again on October 21st. History only focuses on that first televised debate. As a candidate, Kennedy was trailing by a wide margin in the public’s opinion. He was “untested” and very young at 43 years of age. Kennedy not only thoroughly researched the potential debate topics, over 100 memorized answers from index cards, but left no stone unturned by visiting the CBS studio in advance for the lighting conditions and temperature etc. Meanwhile, the seasoned politico, Nixon arrived on the debating scene after multiple stops on the campaign trail for that late September day. Nixon refused make up to hide his 5 o’clock shadow, wore a gray suit that simply blended into the backdrop, which only accentuated his tired and pale appearance and sweaty brows. Historians are reluctant to state that this one debate turned the campaign on its head for both candidates, but Kennedy won the race by only .2% of the vote, or with about 118,000 votes to spare. 

Nationally televised debates can impact a candidate’s chances of winning the oval office, and that’s why they have been a staple of each election year since 1976. What an incredible opportunity to address the voting public, especially if the candidates can effectively articulate their plan going forward. The bygone days of the orator who spell bounds an entire nation may never return. However, issues that deeply divide our country seem to be the one constant over time and throughout our history. Webster’s words, “Let our object be our country, our whole country and nothing but our country” if taken up as a battle cry today, could go a long way toward the healing of our nation, where once again, we could honestly pledge to one another that this is “one country, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all”. 

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

87 years young

 Today, September 16th, 2024, is my mother’s 87th birthday and it is also our granddaughter’s 5th birthday! It is really special to be 87 today. It is really special to be 5 too.  

This is not the topic I intended to blog about next, but seeing how I’m still working on my original topic and today is, well, simply special, this is today’s topic. 

One may ask, “What does it take to achieve these milestones?” One word that comes to my mind immediately is – tenacity. Assuredly over nine decades, there have been moments that have been challenging; challenging to the point of being life-changing. Then, there always are those “bumps in the road”, as mother calls them. There are a few challenges of being five and having just started pre-school too; your older sister trying to be bossy and over protective because she has been there and done that before you. 

Ask my mum, she will tell you it can be scary being her age. She has overcome so much through her life, issues that others might have considered as handicaps, but issues that my mother takes as just being part of life. Can’t help having your mind drift to the question, “What’s coming next?”. And for our granddaughter, with all of the pomp and ceremony, do you think the first day of school and all that is to come after, doesn’t scare the bejeebers out of most kids? 

Today is a day, though, to celebrate achievements and landmarks in each of their lives.  

In my historical fictional account of my 3rd great grandmother’s life, “Oh! Susannah”, I attempted to tell her story. It is a story of her achievements under trying conditions, and her achievements have been handed down through generations as gifts to me. In Susannah’s short 39-year stay here on earth, she achieved the milestone of instilling principles in her children, which lasted through their lifetime and beyond. As the reader discovers in the book, Susannah was tenacious, but also scared at times. Susannah was as special as these ladies who are celebrating their birthdays today. 

I’ll close this blog by sharing portions of a message I received just the other day from a young lady I met on my book tour last year. A lot has happened in this woman’s life since I last saw her but she wanted to pass on the inspiration she has pulled from in reading Susannah’s story - “I think of Suzannah occasionally and how hard her (and so many others) lives had been. I’m just in awe that out of women throughout time and history, I get to be one who had a safe, emotionally supported birth, own and do business, rely on modern convenience to run my home, etc. Your book provided a lot of perspective for me – very humbling and very grateful for the strong women who have gone before us.” And may I add, thanks and congratulatory recognition to those who lead us forward. 

 

Happy Birthday, you two! Can you pass me another piece of cake? 

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

IMPORTANT TO FEMALES

An advertisement titled, “Important To Females”, for Dr. Cheeseman’s Female Pills appeared in the Carroll Free Press on January 31, 1863. Quoting, “The health and life of women is continually in peril if she is mad enough to neglect or maltreat those sexual irregularities to which two thirds of her sex are more or less subject. ... To wives and matrons – Dr. Cheeseman’s Pills are offered as the only safe means of renewing interrupted menstruations, but Ladies must bear in mind that ... they will prevent the expected events. ... Explicit directions, detailing when and where they should be used is in each box.”

While researching my historical fiction, “Oh! Susannah”, I came across this advertisement numerous times. Then, I read, as a cross reference, another source that confirmed in the 19th century, pregnancies among unmarried women were historically considered to lead to the bulk of abortions and that abortion was one of the birth control options employed by married women too. Tim Crumrin writes, “Abortion in the early nineteenth century simply did not elicit the controversy or comment as today ... it was not necessarily condemned out of hand if carried out early in the pregnancy. ... Abortion, like birth control information, became more available between 1830 and 1850. That period saw a mail order and retail abortifacient drug trade flourish. A woman could send away for certain pills or discreetly purchase them at a store. Surgical methods were available but dangerous and seldom used.” The point I’m making is, even though women back then did not have the right to vote, nor make addresses to public gatherings, nor have standing in court to automatically divorce her husband or retain the rights to keep her children, they did have responsibility and full say over their bodies and their reproductive rights.

Since the Dobbs Vs. Jackson decision by the Supreme Court on June 24, 2022, this is no longer true in the United States. By a vote of 6 to 3, the Justices ruled that abortion is no longer a constitutionally protected right of women. The wording of the majority (all six being Republican – three of whom are recent Trump appointees) is that abortion is a matter to be left up to the States. In anticipation of this ruling, fourteen States adopted “trigger laws” that took affect almost immediately upon the release of the ruling. Therefore, now across a large number of States, there are total or near total bans on abortion. The effect of this ruling has provoked no uniform law across the country and has seen women in restrictive States traveling across state lines to receive medical care for instances of rape and incest.

The other question I raise is: Should this even be an issue that our Supreme Court meddles in? The drafters of our Constitution strove for a system of checks and balances and foresaw men selected to sit on a Supreme Court to eschew wisdom and deliver decisions that Americans would recognize as being fair and impartial; think of the imagery of our “Lady Justice” blindfolded and finely balancing scales.

While this may have been the best of our forefather’s intentions, let’s take a look at some of the actual results coming from this supreme law-of-the-land body.

The Dred Scott Vs Sandford case. I address this decision in my book as it is considered to be one of the reasons our country entered into a civil war. On March 6, 1857, Justice Taney read the majority decision (7-2) that enslaved people are not citizens of the United States and therefore have no protection from the Federal Government or the Courts. This dreadful decision meant that a free Black slave could not necessarily remain “free” should he travel into a slave state. Seven of the nine jurors were from the Democrat Party, President Andrew Jackson having appointed four of the justices.

Plessy Vs. Ferguson – May 18, 1896 – when Justice Henry Billings Brown wrote the majority opinion (7-1) confirming the legitimacy of “Jim Crow” laws. He stated that while the 14th Amendment was intended to ensure political equality between the black and white races, the amendment did not abolish the social inequality, and that segregation did not constitute unlawful discrimination. Five Republicans were Justices on this bench, one well known for his bias against the Black race. One of the Democrat Justices was recorded as always voting for “Jim Crow” laws and another Democrat Justice known to be a KKK member.

Seventy-Seven years later ... Roe Vs. Wade - January 22, 1973. Seven of nine Supreme Court Justices ruled that the right to privacy implied in the 14th Amendment protected abortion as a fundamental right. However, the government did reserve the right to regulate or restrict access depending on the stage of the pregnancy. Keep in mind, as late as the 1960’s, abortion was illegal in most of the states. Six of the jurors were either Democrats or known to be liberal Republicans or passionate advocates for abortion rights.

Is it just me or does anyone else find it weird that our system of justice is determined by nine individuals, with their own vested interests, who hand down court determinations for the extent of their lifetime; decisions that so often adversely affect many of us? Think of it as our Lady Justice peeking out from behind her blindfold, making sure that the correct thumb is being placed on the scales of justice. We’re supposed to be living in a democracy, right? Where the powers of government are invested in the people and for the people; where the people have the final say.

President Biden recently prepared a proposal for Supreme Court Reform where “guard rails” could be applied to the Supreme Court’s Justices. His proposal was sent to the House of Representative’s Speaker of the House, Republican Mike Johnson, who summarily declared the President’s proposal “dead on arrival”. So, in this current hostile political environment, what would be wrong with limiting Congressmen, Senators, and Supreme Court Justices to 18 years’ service? Would we receive better representative government? The political power these Parties wield over one another is nothing other than power conferred on to them by us when we vote.

Retiring U.S. Senator from West Virginia, Joe Manchin, said it most succinctly in a recent interview, “Simply codify Roe V. Wade”.

The joy we have as being Americans is that we can have the final say in matters that are important to us and evoke change. It’s a matter of us exercising our right to vote, and in my humble opinion, voting for those who are dedicated to restoring the rights of women and their right to choose what happens with their bodies.

In 1863, it was important for females to at least have control over their bodies. It should be equally important to women today, and for all of us, who only want justice to prevail over politics.

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

Stephen Foster

Earlier this month, my wife and I celebrated our anniversary over the the July 4th holiday in Bardstown, Kentucky. We had previously toured through the 19th century mansion, which Stephen Foster had called home as a child. The majestic mansion, which stood proudly over 1300 acres of plantation and was owned by Foster's uncle, John Rowan, looks very much today as it did yesteryear. However, during our recent visit, we took in an amphitheater production of Foster's life and music, one that has been performed every year since 1958!

I was surprised to learn that Stephen Foster was actually born in Lawrenceville, Pennsylvania and spent most of his life in Pittsburgh, but visited Bardstown and fell in love with the appeals of Southern life. He was also exposed to the cruelties exhibited during this time period to the slave population, which translated into and influenced his song writing. The biggest influence, though, was his besotted affection for the young lass, Jane McDowell, who hailed from Pittsburgh. So much of Foster's creativity was driven by his passion to win "Jeanie's" hand, as was the main point of the amphitheater production. Their story also reinforced to me the old adage, "Artisans" - those who create art - always can be found on the bottom of society's financial ladder. This message was the main theme of the show.

What I didn't know was that Stephen Foster had encounters with a young Andrew Carnegie, who became a driving force during the "Gilded Age"; a time period I feature in my upcoming sequel.

There was a full three hours of Stephen Foster's compositions within the production, which featured his claim to fame songs - "Camptown Races", Swanee River", "My Old Kentucky Home", and "Oh! Susannah", a song I used as my debut novel and historical fiction depicting my third great grandmother's life - Susannah Reigle. www.beckleysbooks.com

I couldn't help smiling as the actors belted out the lyrics to "Oh! Susannah" and everyone danced about on stage. Here I was in Kentucky and they were shamelessly playing this song, , the song which became the reason for the state of Kentucky banning my book last year. You see, I am driven by authenticity and when my publisher questioned me, not once, but three times as to the validity of the lyrics I used at the beginning of my book, I stated quite confidently that these were the exact words that Stephen Foster had penned. What I learned from the amphitheater event was that Foster used his experiences in black minstrels and parlours as inspiration for his compositions and at one point, exclusively wrote "Plantation Songs".

Stephen Foster was born in 1826 and died in 1864, and during this time period, especially in the South, it was common to use the "N" word throughout your daily life. So, that horrible word shows up in "Oh! Susannah" within Foster's lyrics, and thus, my literary work was banned! And, when I made my appeal, I was informed that the State of Kentucky is so serious about this issue, they took their official State song, "My Old Kentucky Home", and sanitized the lyrics of the offensive word to comply with today's etiquette. Ok, I pled guilty, and none of my books, which have several chapters embedded with life in Kentucky, will ever be distributed.

Moving on, Stephen Foster's life's story and his success as "The Father of American Music", would never have been known or retold today if not for his infatuation with Jane McDowell. Long story short, with his emotive appeals, he won Janie's hand, she forfeiting what might have been a comfortable life as the wife of the mayor of Pittsburgh. She reluctantly turned her back away from this lifestyle to take a punt on a struggling artist/composer. Perhaps Foster's direct emotional appeal via his popular song, "Jeanie With The Light Brown Hair", made an heartfelt difference to his amour? Without doubt, Foster's strong point was his undoubted musicality, having taught himself to play the clarinet, guitar, flute, and piano, but his business acumen was not so good. Regardless, Jane McDowell followed her heart and chose Foster to marry in 1850. Sadly, due to overwhelming debts, the couple divorced four years later, and as depicted in the play, Foster's alcoholic demons took reign over his life.

Stephen Foster and Janie McDowell only had one child and there is no other reference of Foster having any family involvement after 1854. Stephen Collins Foster died on January 13, 1864, at the age of 37 and under suspicious circumstances. He was found in a pool of blood by his publicist in a hotel (flop house). Did Foster die three day's later from a serious neck injury due to a fall or was his death from a failed suicide attempt? His obituary mentions Foster having died of dissipation and drink.

I was amazed to learn that one of Foster's most famous songs, "Beautiful Dreamer", which was supposedly written to woo his mistress, Jane McDowell, wasn't actually published until after his death - 10 years after the marriage had ended. Notwithstanding, the emotive lyrics of Beautiful Dreamer gives one an impression of his mindset at the time of writing; "its only words, and words are all I have, to take your heart away." Even more amazingly how a down and out composer could keep a song so personal and moving under wraps, it only surfacing posthumously.

Here are the lyrics, and if you are familiar with the the tune, don't be shy, sing it out loud, if no other place, then in the shower.

Beautiful Dreamer

Beautiful Dreamer, wake unto me.

Starlight and dewdrops are waiting for thee.

Sounds of the rude world heard in the day.

Lull'd by the moonlight have all passed away!

Beautiful Dreamer, queen of my song

List while I woo thee with soft melody;

Gone are the cares of life's busy throng.

Beautiful Dreamer, awake unto me!

Beautiful Dreamer, awake unto me!

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

July 14, 1876

On this day 148 years ago, local farmers were in a vortex of activity occurring all around them. Two months previously, "The Centennial" celebrations had commenced in the city of "Brotherly Love", Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. By July, a few influential Carroll County, Ohio residents had visited, no doubt using the advertisements in the local Carroll Chronicle as their guide in planning their ultimate adventure. The paper listed several "renowned" hotels situated close to the Pennsylvania Railroad tracks; such as "The Holland Association" at 419 N. Main St. SE in Philadelphia, promoted as "an institution having a high reputation for honorable conduct". I assume this assurred prospective guests that they wouldn't encounter any "ladies of the night" within their establishment.

The Centennial, celebrating 100 years of the nation's birth, was an incredible affair. The grounds were situated on the line of the PA RR and encompassed 450 acres of Fairmont Park. The largest buildings ever constructed were here, the top five covering 50 acres and costing $5 million to build, and then there were 195 more temporary structures. The phrase, "build it and they will come" was never more evident with 1,250,000 people counted in attendance during the month of May alone. The Centennial would carry on for 6 months, finally wrapping up in November. For reference, each State was given a piece of the fair grounds to create a story of their individual heritage, and, there were many other fledgling businesses on display too. Some of which would grow into mighty monopolies during the upcoming "Gilded Age".

The summer of '76 was also known for its hotly contested presidential political campaign - Hays vs Tilden. Some may say, "Who?", but many current political scholars have referenced this 1876 election as a direct comparison to the contested 2020 election. In 1876, the Democrat, Samuel Tilden, secured the vast majority of the country's votes, but this was insufficient to clearly secure the win in the electoral college. So, the result of the presidential election was tossed into the House of Representatives, where reportedly lots of skulduggery led to the Republican, Rutherford Hays, being declared the winner by one vote.

As if all this wasn't enough to stir up the nation during this memorable year, many were also keeping a close eye on "The Indian Wars" out west. People were still fighting the different tribes as late as 1876? Most definitely, yes!

General George A. Custer hailed from the humble crossroads known as "New Rumley" in Harrison County, Ohio, just a skip and a hop from the Carroll county border. You visit today "downtown" New Rumley and you'll see the impressive monument of Custer mounted on his horse. However, and despite many "Custer" relations in the area, General Custer is best known in his "home town" of Monroe, Michigan, where his family moved to from Ohio. At one point, I seriously thought that my lineage traced to Custer, but this was not to be.

From all accounts, Custer was an untamed persona who was on a mission to remove the Indian stalwarts from the land, land which the US Government had moved their tribes on to. Custer's goal was to clear the land for the settlers who were pioneering their way west.

Custer took a brash approach to removing an Indian conclave - Little Big Horn, Montana - which consisted of between 2,500 and 4,000 warriors. I say "brash" because his orders were to split his limited number of US troops into five different divisions, each separated from one another. Needless to say, all the troops were systematically destroyed by such great Indian leaders such as the famous "Sitting Bull".

Let's fast forward to the end. Reportedly, Gen. Custer shot three Indians as they attacked his troops who were huddled in a narrow ravine. Custer killed three others with his saber before he was felled by a shot through his head by the aggrieved Indian chief, Rain-In-The-Face, who had recently been incarcerated by the US troops.

Reports in the July 14th edition of the Carroll Chronicle relayed the breaking story to the local residents. "The whole number killed was three hundred and fifteen ... The battleground look like a slaughter-pen, as it really was, being in a narrow ravine. The dead bodies were much mutilated." Reporting in the following week's edition highlighted how "Mrs. Custer is left without blood relation (Custer and his two brothers, nephews, and brother-in-law were all murdered) ... Mrs. Custer bore up bravely at first, but now is almost in despair ... She believes her husband fell alive into the hands of the Indians, and was tortured to death."

Here are my main two takes from all of this.

First, the battle of Little Big Horn actually took place on June 25th, a full twenty days before the news of this catastrophic event reached Carroll County residents. Imagine today a national event or travesty taking twenty days for all of the country to hear of it? Most commonly today, we know within minutes of major breaking news stories.

Secondly, in a recent discussion with a colleague of mine, I mentioned how information today is many times more guarded in how it is released to the public. Back in 1876, the press left little to the reader's imagination. "Bismarck, Dak., July 9. The remains bear many evidences of torture. Some seem to have been shot with arrows in certain parts while still living, and from others, portions of their bodies were removed. The heads of nearly all had been crushed with stone clubs. In some cases the heads were severed from the body and the entrails taken from some, and from many the limbs were chopped off. Some bodies were partly burned. The clothing belonging to some was found and recognized, but the bodies could not be found." This unedited version today would be considered way too much information.

Personally, I wouldn't mind a little bit of the detail though, of what went on, but sans the blow by blow description. Perhaps, such as the reporter in this local article submitted?

"N.Y. Herald - Custer's Battlefield, Little Horn, June 28, via Bismarck, D.T., July 6, I write from the scene of Custer's magnificent but terribly fatal charge, from a plateau on which, but a few hours since, I saw at a glance 115 heroic soldiers of the Seventh United States Cavalry lying where they fell at the hands of a savage foe, cold and dead. Near the top of a little knoll in the center of this plateau lay Custer himself, and it touched my heart to see that the savages, in a kind of a human recognition of heroic clay, had respected the corpse of the man they knew so well. Other bodies were mutilated; Custer was untouched - a tribute of respect more real than a title of nobility. He lay as if asleep, his face calm and a smile upon his lips ..."

These were the events reported 148 years ago today on what was a hot summer's day back then and with a country embroiled in so much turmoil. Will our country, as a united people, be able to celebrate this country's 250th birthday in two years' time? I'm not sure, but civility might be our only chance.

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

THE ACCORDION PLAYER

I'm really looking forward to addressing the Carroll County Retired Teachers Association on Friday, June 28th. My presentation will focus on the lives of women in the 19th Century, specifically the life of my 3rd Great Grandmother, Susannah Reigle Beckley, who lived her entire life in Carroll County, Ohio during this time period. If you haven't already obtained a personally signed copy of my historical fiction, "Oh! Susannah", then now is a good time to get one.

A relative of mine suggested I make contact with Rose, who is the organizer of the local retired teachers, and I did last year. With our schedules being as they are, I heard back from Rose earlier this year and we didn't really get a chance to talk and exchange information until this past March. After taking care of the business side of things, Rose asked, "Are you related to Wilda Beckley who used to be the music teacher in town?"

"That's my grandmother!," I exclaimed. "She and I used to play for special town events, also at the nursing home, and in some churches; she on her accordion, which had "Wilda" in sparkly letters on the spine, and me on my snare drum. There wasn't a polka we couldn't play to entertain the crowd."

Rose then mentioned how she took lessons from my grandmother from the 5th grade, and right through to her early years in college. The penny dropped! "You're not Rose Mary Cerneva, are you?" I asked. "If so, you were my grandmother's star pupil!" My how this conversation brought back vivid memories for me, of summers in my teen years spent in my grandparent's sitting room most mornings playing cards with my friend Alan. We both would be anxiously waiting for my grandmother's last pupil to pack up their music box and depart. It would only be minutes later when the three of us would be in that 1968 Ford Falcon and heading for the "swimming hole", otherwise known as Atwood Lake.

That accordion and my grandmother's love of music was also a mainstay of each of our family get togethers and those "Beckley Sisters" - my grandmother's sisters - in -law - were always the dancers. What a show! One that I'll never forget.

Wilda Beckley taught 118 students between 1955 and 1982 so it only seemed right that her bedazzled accordion be donated, and for many years on display, at the Carroll County Historical Society.

I was living in New Zealand back in 1997 when my grandparents celebrated their final anniversary together - 60 years - my grandfather, Bill, passing in 2000 and my grandmother following in 2001. But, what a grand party that anniversary celebration was! I saw it on snippets of a video my family had taken and sent down to me. We all remember how the camcorder was all the rage back then, a precursor of our I Phone cameras today.

There was my grandmother in her wheelchair tapping her fingers to the music, for she had suffered a stroke years before, which ended her accordion playing days. There were also the Beckley Sisters I saw on tape dancing up a storm. But, who was playing the accordion? A quick pan by the videographer showed me Rose Mary Cerneva seated front and center with her accordion merrily playing many of the all-time favorites.

"So, your dad invited me and my husband to your grandparent's anniversary party," Rose recounted in our recent conversation. "We were about to pull out of the drive and I told my husband that I should throw my accordion in the trunk, just in case. Then, at the party, your dad came up to me and said, "What a shame that I didn't ask you to bring your accordion." to which I told him, I'll go get it, it's in the car!"

Rose went on to say how playing "The Anniversary Waltz" meant so much to my grandmother as there were tears in her eyes. I readily agreed saying how the glimpse I got was of my grandmother smiling ear to ear, filled with pride and pleasure of hearing these old tunes again; tapping her fingers and nodding while keeping time to Rose's playing of "Sentimental Journey".

It's going to be a sentimental time this Friday at the Carroll County Retired Teachers Association meeting and I can't wait to reunite with my grandmother's treasured student and friend - Rose.

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

COMING HOME

This past week my travels took me back home where I had an opportunity to visit with my mother and do further research on the sequel to my historical fiction, "Oh! Susannah".

It was good to spend some time in the hometown and just not pass through; brought back memories actually. Back in the day, the village was a bustling place with lots of businesses downtown, which drew locals to a place they could gather and mingle. There were parks, tidy homes and clean streets. This is just not me reminiscing. The residents actually took a great deal of pride in where they lived.

I shouldn't have been surprised, but as I left town early Friday morning, I was struck at how beautiful downtown is at present, brick-paved streets, nearly all the shops occupied and showing pride of ownership. It occurred to me that, while other communities had fallen on hard times, my hometown looked as good as ever! Matter of fact, there are still well-maintained parks, tidy homes - my mother won "Yard Of The Week" for her meticulous gardens, and yes, the city's streets are still clean.

Unbekownst to me when I planned this visit, the annual Homecoming was scheduled for last week, and this event typically draws everyone to the Community Center and Brock Park, if for nothing else then to support the local Lion's Club by purchasing a "Lion Burger".

Talk about bringing back memories, my mind flashed back to the 1970's when the anticipation of The Homecoming was the height of summer. These memories, though, are not all good. Back then, I mowed lawns for two dozen, mostly older ladies in town, who basically paid for my first two years of college. To them I'll always be grateful, but, there were days when the last thing I wanted to do was mow lawns. One instance in particular was when I was cutting the grass of an elderly lady whose granddaughter was visiting. Her name was "Annette". My arrival had the effect of moving Annette off of her beach towel where she had been soaking up the summer's rays. But, she announced, that was ok because she was going to go across the street and over the bridge and take in the "matinee" that the carnival guys were putting on that afternoon. Looking across that lazy trickle of a stream the locals know as The Little Sandy Creek, oh how I wanted to go to the homecoming that afternoon. I would give anything just to be there and take in the atmosphere, maybe buy something to eat or enjoy an amusement ride. So close, yet so far away.

I arrived at my mother's house on Thursday, having missed the week's main event - The Parade - which usually lasts for hours. I've always been amazed how there is anybody left to watch the parade when seemingly everyone from the community is in the parade!

Anyway, with no pre-arrangements in place, I was going to suggest that my mother and I go down to the homecoming and get a couple Lion Burgers for dinner, for it didn't seem too crowded when I had driven by. However, my mother had our dinner all laid out on the table, just awaiting my arrival, and I never brought up my idea of going to the park.

It struck me how I was ok not going to the homecoming, genuinely indifferent after all of these years. This just seemed so out of character for me. It is sobering when one acknowledges that when and where has remained the same, and it's only me who has changed.

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

The Boys Of Summer

"At the crack of a bat, the silence on this sultry summer afternoon was shattered. There were only a scattered few spectators watching this bat-and-ball sport, one that everyone previously knew as "Round Ball", and yet the gathered folks were now on their feet and cheering the young lad who was rounding the bases. His bare feet pounded the parched soil that had been laid bare by the scorching sun, his arms mechanically thrusting with each stride as every ounce of youthful energy was being summoned to get him as far around the infield as he could go.

John had never before struck the ball with such authority and seeing its flight arch high and wide past the opposing team's fielder was quite a thrill. It never crossed his mind that his team mate had already crossed home plate with a go-ahead run for their team. John, with his curly locks flowing in the wind, was firmly focused on rounding the base paths toward that last infield base. Instinctively, he knew the ball could arrive before he did, the look on the third baseman's face said as much. So, for fame or infamy, John leapt in the air throwing his body as close to the guarded base as possible. A sand-like grit covered his face and was sprinkled throughout his hair from his landing and sliding over the base and consequently into the fielder. A gasp from the crowd of observers nearby was the only audible sound until moments later, the umpire noticing the loose ball on the ground, pronounced John as "safe", whereupon the home crowd erupted once more with cheers, a delightful sound that filled the valley."

This is just a snippet from my upcoming book, which covers our nation's history through The Gilded Age.

As you and I know, the months of April and May can be fickle, and not always fair-weather friends for those of us in Northeast Ohio. However, by June, one can be pretty safe in the knowledge that summer has finally arrived and thus also, the enjoyment of our "favorite pastime". My grandfather used to call the Cleveland Indians "morning glories" because by the start of summer, they had usually faded to the bottom of the standings, but not this year!

Here's a few tidbits for the enthusiast compliments of wikipedia. It was as early as the 1850's when the baseball craze hit the New York Metropolitan area. The game was played by the troops serving in the Civil War and then spread across the country thereafter. In 1863, a rule change disallowed "put outs" made by catching a fair ball on the first bounce and by 1869, the first fully professional club, the Cincinnati Red Stockings, was formed and went undefeated against a schedule of semi-pro teams. Then, the National League was founded in 1876, which is around the time of my snippet of opening text. 1884 saw the legalization of overhand pitching and with other minor changes, by 1893, many of the rules for the game we recognize, were put in place.

Imagine this! During the years prior to 1857, the game had no standard distance between the bases and there were no restrictions to the number of players who were on the field at any one time, everyone just ran around until one team happened to score twenty one runs.

There are those of us who live for the sounds and smells of summer, as well as the feeling of its warmth on our skin. Oh, and let's not forget the umpire's barking, "Play Ball!"

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

Mei-Re, My Angel

I looked into the driver's side of an early model imported car that probably had received tender loving care, but obviously, that had been awhile ago. Seated behind the wheel was an older Polynesian woman who flashed me a smile, one that a visitor comes to expect from the friendly folks who live in Rarotonga, which is one of the tropical Cook Islands found in the South Pacific.

My greetings didn't startle Mei-Re for she saw me walking across the street towards her, so, she continued to casually roll her cigarette while enquiring what I wanted from her. You see, Mei-Re ("May Ray"), when said quickly and with an accent, sounded like "Mary" to me, so that's how I addressed my new-found acquaintance, and she hearing my accent, knew better than to correct me, as many American tourists pay little attention to other's cultural differences when abroad.

So, what was my issue? This had been the last day of our stay and over the course of the previous three days on the island, my wife and I had somewhat mastered their public transportation. There are two buses; one going clockwise, the other traveling anti-clockwise. What could possibly go wrong? Well first, there was the issue with the bus's timetable. It was published because there must be one, but as the attendant behind the desk at our Moana Sands Resort explained, the 12:05pm stop could be ten or fifteen minutes either side of that precise minute, and then she flashed us that Polynesian smile. Yes, it is one thing when the local lunch bar states on their website that they open at 9am every day, and after walking twenty minutes for a meat pie, I'm greeted by a home made sign informing me that the shop opens at 11am. For all I know, there's a different sign for each day or for that matter, a totally different start time for whenever they feel like opening. However, it is an entirely different matter when you are completely reliant upon a bus and it's regularity. Welcome, Mr. Beckley, to "Island Time".

Oh, how I envied all those young and old, zipping past us on their scooters. If only we'd organized a scooter, we could be whipping around the island at our leisure too. Instead, we found ourselves sipping a beer with a local under one of the island's large indigenous trees. My heart had hope, seeing another person standing at the bus stop within metres of the grog shop. Knowing that the bus was due in five minutes, I enquired of the Kiwi/Cook Islander standing there the timing of the next bus. His reply, "Fifty minutes, mate." Yes, it had zipped past earlier than scheduled and caught all three of us out. So, we followed his lead, bought a can of beer each and bided our time shooting the afternoon breeze under the tree while watching the surf in the distance.

The bus eventually arrived. It was important that we knew exactly where to exit because all the businesses and restaurants and houses were intermixed and difficult to distinguish one from another. The Sandy Bay Restaurant signage was nearly missed due to the advertisements for the motel units that were positioned in front of this popular eatery. Soon we were meandering our way through the cottages and found the beach front bar that also included a few picnic tales in the sand. This was the restaurant. It was definitely waterfront, but again the website was a bit deceptive when it said "Open Now". What was "open" was the bar. The restaurant's chef never arrives before 6pm. We were hoping for an early meal, so we enjoyed a beverage and the surf and the roaming wild dogs. These dogs are sacred so they wander the entire island unmolested and tourist are warned not to feed or approach them. With empty wine glasses we decided to catch the bus back to our resort and if we cashed out right then, we'd probably be just in time for the counter clockwise bus.

We stood on the roadside with our shopping bags for fifteen minutes before resigning ourselves to the fact we had missed our bus. We painfully watched scooter after scooter whizz past us while we waited for the next bus. Then, there was the clockwise bus that drove by on the other side of the road. My wife suggested that we should attempt to get on that bus, but I suggested otherwise knowing it would take us so much longer going that route. Then, the clockwise bus flew past us again! We had been waiting for ninety minutes and I'll admit a bit of trepidation began to sink in to my conscious. What if we have to walk back to the resort? It's dusk and two obviously tired and hungry tourists would be prime targets for any unfortunate event.

I had been sizing up the dilapidated house opposite us for ninety minutes. It was on the immediate south side of the driveway that led to the restaurant. Both the house and the grounds could use a lot of help, but I put my observations down to "Island Life". Then appearing from the house was Mei-Re, who was on her way out, for whatever reason.

"What are you looking for, eh?", she asked.

The words describing our predicament stumbled out of my mouth in much of a jumble. She was most likely watching us standing there the whole time and knew the answer to her question before she asked it.

"Didn't anyone tell you that the counter clockwise finishes up at 4:30? Hmm. What a shame. Would you like a ride?"

There were no sweeter words for my ears at that moment and I quickly added, "I will pay you."

Seated in the front with Mei-Re, I asked if she was a Cook Islander. She explained how she was born in the Cook Islands, but spent all of her life in NZ before recently returning to her home land.

"Where about in NZ did you live?", I enquired.

"Hawkes Bay", she replied.

I knew of the devastating cyclone Gabrielle that ripped through that region of NZ the year before, and I asked if the cyclone had affected any of her family.

Mei-Re paused and then simply nodded her head not wanting to say another word on the topic.

My wife and I were to later journey through that part of NZ and witness first hand the effects and brute force of that storm. The results were that many people didn't survive it and even more lost everything they had. It was time to change the subject.

"What keeps you busy?" I asked Mei-Re next.

She happily explained how she is retired and returned to the Cook Islands to work on her health, which was improving. She volunteered at the local school teaching children English and NZ's native tongue, Maori. I could sense Mei-Re derived a lot of satisfaction from her volunteering efforts, then she went on to explain how she preached at her church too.

Astonished, I asked, "Are you a minister?"

"No, not really. Just an Episcopalian Lay Preacher", she corrected me.

I told her, "Well, we have something in common as one of my best friends is an Episcopalian Priest and he also married Deb & me!"

Needless to say the thirty-five minute drive back to our resort simply flew by as we were deeply engaged in conversation. Yet, at last we had arrived and Mei-Re looked straight into my eyes and said, "I've been your angel today."

"Yes! Yes, you have Mary. May God continue to use you in your chosen ministries here on the island. I can't thank you enough for your kindness today and sharing your life stories with us." And with that said, I handed her the largest bill in my wallet.

Mei-Re doesn't begin her day knowing how she will be used to impact other's lives. She just goes about her day being receptive and perceptive of other's needs. May I encourage you to be someone's Mei-Re, someone's angel.

Don't forget to check out my other blogs by clicking on to www.beckleysbooks.com

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

WELCOME BACK, KOTTER

Welcome Back! It's been a marvelous 3 months away, away from work, my book tour, and blogging. I can definitely recommend being absent from Northeast Ohio from Christmas to Easter. Now, though, I'm back and have so much to share, not only of my travels, but of my research into America's Gilded Age and the colorful characters from this era who left their imprint on society forever.

Your Dreams Were Your Ticket Out. Yes, they were, and yet I never envisaged there would be so many people in my travels who would leave their impression on me. Here are just a few:

Yoshua DiCarpio is quite the musician and during his break at Java Jive in Honokowai, he made a bee line for my wife and me. Yes, we enjoyed his set, but Yoshua is so personable and talented and he's from Cleveland, Ohio!

The Lady From Lahaina whom I met at the laundromat who apologized for taking so many of the washing machines. As she explained, she lost her home to the fires and is now forced to do the family's laundry at the only available laundromat.

Our Hostess At Moana Sands In Rarotonga Cook Islands who despite having family in town for an unveiling (a remembrance ceremony a year after the funeral), she supplied us, from her own garden, a constant supply of passion fruit and dragon fruit.

Our Waiter, Levi, At The Crown Range Lounge In Parnell Auckland, New Zealand, who knows how to deliver top notch service. Levi made sure we were personally introduced to Jung Song, the owner of the restaurant and the Crown Range vineyards in the Bendigo wine region, where she is known for the quality drop "China Girl".

Our Air New Zealand Seat Mate during our flight to Queenstown, a young lady and school teacher from Boston. She is currently touring through NZ and Australia and had been to Queenstown before as evidenced by her sipping on a Speights. What blew our mind was during her previous visit, she had trekked the cliffs of the Southern Alps from Wanaka to Queenstown. It took us an hour to drive the Crown Range. This young lady completed her journey in 4 days! She is traveling on a one-way ticket, earning money along the way at odd jobs, and with no definite day of returning to the US.

Michael, just 3 months out of London, and loving following his passion for wine at the Mt. Difficulty vineyard in Bannockburn, Central Otago. We made an instant connection sharing stories in common, and Michael sharing his knowledge of the vineyard with me. I tried not to stare at his painted white fingernails, but decided this only complimented his colorful personality.

Felix Our Wine Tasting Server At The Mt. Rosa Vineyards who instantly made us his friends once he learned my best friend is from Malaysia. Felix is Malaysian also and is working in the Gibbston Valley saving up funds for his upcoming wedding. One week later and while we were at another tasting room, Felix's name came up again. He's that memorable!

Rommel who was serving us tastings of Valli wines. We purchased a flight of 3 wines, yet ended up with 6 as Rommel kept finding different samples that we just had to try. A doctor by trade from Dubai and an entrepreneur extraordinaire, our day was made so much richer by our time with Rommel.

The Young Lass With A Slight French Accent originally from Connecticut, but who is brilliantly representing the chef at the Rockferry Wine Restaurant. I was immediately sold by her description of the chef's special of the day - pate' - one that had been crafted using a boar's snout and jowl. Two kilometers down the road the chef's friend, a pig farmer, had only slaughtered the beast just 3 weeks' prior. The delicacy was to die for and to top it off the chef made an appearance at our table with shavings of prosciutto from the same beast.

Margot and her talented and personable husband who allowed us to stay at their batch, which had panoramic views over Cooks Beach, for two nights. They supplied us with freshly picked passion fruit and avocados, which had only fallen from the trees in the orchard. Our most memorable event with them is when a wild boar appeared in their/our back yard at dusk. There was only one option and that was to fell it. Our host came to warn us that a gunshot would take place and not to be alarmed.

We also stayed at a beautiful historic stone cottage in Clyde, NZ. While enjoying an amazing meal at the Stoaker Room in Oliver's Restaurant, a young girl who was excited to tell us of her starting university, cashed us out. She enquired where we were staying, and yes she knew of the cottage. It was her great, great grandmother who grew up in this one-room home and we learned of its history and how our cottage was originally the village's doctor's office.

Then, there's Dom Mondillo. Sounds Italian, right? Well, his family is from the East Coast of the US. We learned of Dom's notoriety only 2 days into our journey of the South Island. We made an appointment through Dom's wife to visit the Mondillo Estate. When we arrived at the tasting room, Dom came over the hillside on his farm bike. What an engaging man, and one whom is responsible for the start up of the Bendigo wine region back in the 1970's and 80's! He knows this country like the back of his hand and has seen everything imaginable during his tenure, especially telling us his stories during Covid. We had to buy a bottle of his wine that he's named "Nina" in honor of his mother back in the States.

Our B&B Hostess In Nelson/Richmond Whom We'll Call The "Lavender Lady", for she harvests lavender for a living. We loved the outdoor soaking tub that she had provided for our leisure and are so grateful for her recommendation to visit "The Grape Escape" in town for brunch. What a delightful venue this is and while my wife was memorized by "Colonel Mustard", the parakeet, two middle-aged ladies sitting opposite to us struck up a conversation with me. Long story short, one of the ladies owned a cafe in Paihia in the Bay Of Island - at the other end of the country - during the 1980's. She not only knew of my NZ family's "Aunty Daph", but provided her in-home care until the grand lady's death. There were so many stories to share, and yes, it is a small world.

Finally, it was time to fly out of Auckland. My wife and I were playing cards in a bistro, biding our time, when the guy across from us asks what game we were playing. Turns out he is from Canada and was heading back home too, where he was looking forward to playing the exact same card game with his family and children. Yet, this wasn't the most striking interaction that afternoon. An elderly man approaches me in the departure lounge and says, "So, wher deed ya kneek that shurt?" I was somewhat startled because I had not "knicked" my Appalachian Trail shirt, but purchased it in Harper's Ferry, and I told him so. I instantly recognized the typical humor of this ex-pat Kiwi/Aussie, and at the age of 75, he was headed to "Merica" to walk the entire Appalachian Trail. He said it should take him 5 months and a few more days.

Welcome Back To That Same Old Place. Back in Ohio now and adorned in my winter parka again, I have got to acquaint myself with that "same old place" that we call home. We're busy. There's a family member's home that needs clearing out for selling, and in doing so, the difference in life's choices is so stark. Over 66 years of talking about visiting places "one of these days", but the evidence in the house speaks for itself otherwise. Money was saved up in their bank account and so many other everyday "things" were saved and stored as well. But, there is no evidence of leisure travel. I choose to enrich myself with experiences while engaging and learning from others. I guess this is what makes everyone different from one another.

And What Could Ever Lead You Back Here - Where We Need You? A major part of receiving is giving. All of these aforementioned people, and so many more, enriched our lives during these past 3 months, but we also gave to them through our interaction. So, I'm back to share with you, not only presently, but going forward. Expect another blog shortly; one not so lengthy. Until then, check out my website - www.beckleysbooks.com for my upcoming events. I hope to have a major announcement for you in my next blog too! Til then ...

Welcome Back

Welcome Back

Welcome Back

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

Auld lang Syne

In it's literal sense, "Days Gone By", Auld Lang Syne is a perfect description of 2023. For me, it's been a year of promotion, promoting the rich history found surrounding my 3rd great grandmother, Susannah Reigle, and her family.

Thus, with all things that must pass, it's time to sweep out the past to make way for the new. 2024, for me, will be a year of research and writing as I embark on my sequel, "The Gilded Years - A Novelization of John Hiram Beckley". Stay tuned, but first, it's time for a sabbatical. I'll be re-blogging next after my 3-month hiatus. Til then, may I wish all and sundry, the happiest of new years.

Cheers!

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

Interrupting regularly scheduled programs

I remember as a kid the odd occasion when one of my favorite television programs would simply disappear from the screen, replaced usually by a stern, older man with a grave voice stating, "We interrupt this regularly scheduled program for an important announcement". It was the only means back then to deliver a breaking news event to the country.

Well, it's kind of happening again. Mankind's regularly scheduled programming this week is Christmas, the focus being on all that brings us joy at this time of year. Yet, for the past few days, the important announcement that's on nearly every newscaster's lips is the story of Colorado's Supreme Court declaring that Donald Trump is ineligible to appear on its State Primary Ballots. What I'm hearing over and over is the 14th Amendment's clause of inciting an insurrection.

This blog is as unplanned as the interruption/public service announcement to one's favorite television show, but, all of this chatter about the 14th Amendment has drawn me into the fray.

In my book, "Oh! Susannah" - an historical fiction found on www.beckleysbooks.com - I outline the history of the 14th Amendment in the prelude to Chapter 22, "Postbellum, Petroleum and Prohibition". The inciting of an insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment is nothing more than an afterthought, comparable to a "player to be named later" in a trade of highly touted sports stars today. The 14th Amendment IS about the guarantee of citizenship to all people born in the United States, regardless of race, and the extension of the Constitution's promise of equality to all American citizens. Some people may be aware that John A. Bingham, a congressman from Cadiz, Ohio at the time, is considered to be "The Father of the 14th Amendment. Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black went so far to refer to Bingham as "The James Madison of the 14th Amendment". And yet, Bingham had stiff opposition, namely President Andrew Johnson, who varied between ambivalence and provocation stating enfranchisement for "those persons of color who can read the Constitution of the United States in English and write their names and to all persons of color who own real estate valued at no less than two hundred and fifty dollars." The President boasted thereafter, "Not five hundred would be affected."

This is what the 14th Amendment was about back in 1868. The passage of the 14th Amendment became the legal basis for the Supreme Court's subsequent decisions on desegregation of public schools, equality for women and the creation of the right to sexual privacy.

Yes, the 14th Amendment is something worth interrupting your favorite television show for, even at Christmas. Thank you, John A. Bingham.

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

When visions of sugar plums danced in their heads

Ten days out from Christmas and I'm trying to answer the age-old question, "What is a sugar plum?" I'm 64 years old and for the past 60 years when reading or listening to Clement Clarke Moore's "The Night Before Christmas", I always had an idea what a sugar plum looked like, kind of like a candied fruit.

It's a sweet plum, right? Hmm, not really. Referencing sweets historian Laura Mason's account found in an article in The Atlantic, sugar plums were well known to Englishmen between the 17th-19th century as a sweet made of sugar, also referred to as "comfit". To put you in the picture, take some caraway or cardamom seeds, or you may prefer almonds. Then, wrap a coating of sugar around the seeds, hardening it as you add each layer. Think of a modern day "jawbreaker" with seeds in the middle.

So, there's no fruit involved at all? Interesting. I know there's a history of children receiving fruit, mostly navel oranges, as a Christmas present, so I just assumed fruit was involved in the Christmas Story. Come to think of it, a nice juicy orange would've been a pleasant surprise on a cold wintry day.

And, isn't that same element of surprise a part of the fun when receiving and opening a Christmas parcel? What's inside?

Back in the beginning of the tradition of gift giving (mid-late 19th century in America), shop keepers targeted the public at Christmas time suggesting, "What are gifts but the proof and signs of love?".

In my historical fiction, "Oh! Susannah", I chose the Christmas of 1861 (Chapter 17) to describe what times were like back then at this time of year. For one, it was the first December since 1851 that Susannah had not been pregnant or sick. Secondly, her children were coming of age to appreciate the efforts their mother would've taken to provide them the best Christmas ever. It helped that Susannah was a weaver and was able to make clothes, especially for her daughters. These homemade gifts held more sentimental value to folks then the advertised store-bought ones.

Along with knitted mittens, Susannah's children received rag dolls and underwear as their presents. Looking back when as a child myself, who didn't receive underwear as a present wrapped under the tree? In our family, my sisters and I would have our "stash" of presents in front of us. We soon learned that each parcel did not contain a sugar plum. There were socks and clothes, and woolen hats, house slippers, and yes, underwear - every year! Don't get me wrong. My parents made sure there were a couple gifts that would take our fancy and occupy our attention for days or weeks to come - toys, bikes, games etc.

However, Christmas isn't all about receiving, but more importantly, the act of giving. In my historical fiction, while preparing her children's Christmas gifts, Susannah spares a thought for her brother Sam and his wife who had recently lost two of their children from diptheria. She also laments in the story for those less well-off families living around her who could surely use "the gift of her knitting". Would not a knitted blanket be received as a sugar plum to one in need?

Yesterday, my father-in-law passed away. For a slightly-built man, I was surprised at the heavy bulkiness of his winter coats, and so many of them! This weekend, my wife and I will be paying a visit to our local Haven Of Rest homeless shelter. We've got some sugar plums to deliver. May I suggest to my readers that you do a quick check of your storage closets as well, just to see if there might be a couple sugar plums hiding in there too.

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

THE SUMMER KITCHEN

Somehow "the holidays" and food have always gone hand in hand with one another. I fondly remember that after the traditional Christmas Eve service with the annual cantata being sung by the church choir, the focus of our family shifted to what we were going to eat the next day - for breakfast, lunch and dinner - and who was bringing which dish. Food featured perhaps even more so than the exchanging of gifts.

The anticipation and planning for the Christmas Day meal was both a good thing and a bad one. As kids, our mouths watered at the thought of all the ham, shrimp cocktail and scalloped au gratin potatoes that we could eat. We also knew there would be the presence on the table of the dreaded salads, one that was always made with grapes and walnuts in a mystery white sauce, another featured orange jello with cottage cheese and shredded carrots on top for good measure. Do you remember the log roll of cream cheese that had walnuts and maraschino cherries stuck on it and in it? Don't even get me started with the mince meat and Christmas cake offerings. Those gems could've been used throughout the new year as doorstops if it weren't for those red and green jellies on top.

I hate to admit to this, but one year I traveled back to Ohio from New Zealand at Christmas, and I had been "persuaded" by my significant other that the easiest and cheapest way to arrive with gifts for all of the USA family, was to simply bring mince meat and Christmas cakes for everyone. Been out of the country too long, I guess, for I agreed and we arrived "bearing gifts"; gifts that everyone tossed in the bin once we left.

Christmas hasn't always been associated with special meals. For quite some time early in the 19th century, it wasn't celebrated at all in America. Then, immigrants began introducing their Christmas traditions here. Germans introduced their fondness for decorating pine trees. The English meanwhile showed us what a feat could be.

In the winter of 1863 when things were going poorly for the Union soldiers, Harper's Weekly commissioned Thomas Nast to draw his now famous image of St. Nick, from within his sleigh flying over rooftops, tossing out gifts of socks and clothing to the beleagured troops. This marks the start of what was to become an American-styled Christmas.

I devote an entire chapter in my historical fiction, "Oh! Susannah", to this topic and you can see pictures from this era from the photo gallery of my website - www.beckleysbooks.com

I also talk alot about food in my book, describing how the differences are from today to back then. For instance, many families found there simply wasn't enough space in their home's kitchen. It was quite common for there to be a separate building, which was called the summer kitchen. "Usually a brick structure found only a few feet away from the home and connected by a path from the back porch, the summer kitchen was comprised of a large room with wood or kerosene oil stove, work counters and lots of windows for a good breeze to blow through." There was not only cooking done here, but its where "the family soap was made and the clothes, once washed, could be dried." Fruits as well as herbs were hung from the rafters in the ceiling to be dried too.

But, let's get back to the food. In Chapter 7, Susannah decides to make for her family a special meal; calf's head. "Calf's head should be cleansed with very great care, particularly the lights. The head, the heart and the lights should boil full two hours; the liver should be boiled only one hour. It is better to leave the windpipe on, for it hangs out of the pot while the head is cooking, all the froth will escape through it."

You know, on second thought, come this Christmas, with all the focus on the food that will be on offer for this special meal, go ahead and pass me the mince meat. Times could be worse.

Read More
Gary Beckley Gary Beckley

Chestnuts by the open fire

Who has recently spent time in a doctor's office, urgent care or emergency room? I've been lucky so far and haven't been to any of these places this season, but when out in public, I hear that chesty cough and cringe. Currently, I have way too many family and friends fighting an upper respiratory infection or covid itself. I've been there myself. Many years back I spent six months with a bronchial pneumonia that just wouldn't go away. I was living in New Zealand at the time and if anyone has ever experienced an Auckland winter, you'll know what I mean when I describe their winter months as cold and wet.

No, I'm not talking Northeast Ohio cold where temps don't rise above freezing for months and you just get used to your lawn being a blanket of snow. Winter temperatures in Auckland, New Zealand rarely dip below 40 degrees fahrenheit. Sounds like a reasonable way to make your way through the winter months, right? Well, that is what I banked on when I moved there in 1984. What I soon learned was, with no central heating, 40 degrees outside is like 40 degrees inside. Then, just add the heavy damp air into this weather equation; a cold, wet that soaks through to your bones .... and lungs. This constant dampness had me praying to be back in Ohio's freezing temperatures, but with the comfort of central heating.

There wasn't any central heating back in the 19th century either. Recently, I discovered a vacant old ancestral home in Carroll County, Ohio. While it is still standing after 140+ years, I was taken aback by the condition inside. Vandals had left their mark and all of their trash. What a huge project it would be to try to resurrect this home to it's former beauty. And yet the basic structure appears perfectly sound and the tongue and groove floor boards are still present in most of the rooms I wandered through. What really took my fancy was to find no fewer than three fireplaces still in situ! That's how my grandfather's grandfather's brother and his family kept themselves warm. No doubting that my ancestors worked through their winter colds and flu, just as we do today. However, doesn't a fire pit on every floor with a roaring fire in it sound so inviting? Maybe, it was this exact imagery Nat King Cole was recreating for us when he sang about the chestnuts roasting on an open fire in The Christmas Song? And just in case you were wondering, it was Mel Torme and Robert Wells who actually wrote the lyrics to this song.

And so I'm offering this simple phrase (blog) to kids from one to ninety-two ....

Read More